To What Extent Was The Use Of The Atomic Bomb Justified

Words: 632
Pages: 3

Was the use of the Atomic Bomb justified? This is a question many people debate over since its use in 1945, some people say that the use of this bomb was justified, some disagree with that statement, making it one of those things that is impossible to have both sides agree on one claim. The use of the atomic bombs was unjustified, since the war was almost over and Japan was “on its last leg”, sending more troops and having more missions would have prevented all of the unnecessary deaths of normal civilians like women, children, elderly people and people who were sick. After the bombing, the radiation levels were as high as 4.2r and effects from this radiation caused many birth defects, such as anencephaly, cleft palate, cleft lip with or without cleft palate, club foot, polydactyly, and syndactyly. …show more content…
The decision to drop atomic bombs on these two cities resulted in unprecedented destruction and loss of life, marking a turning point in modern history. By the end of 1945, the bombing had killed an estimated 140,000 people in Hiroshima, and a further 74,000 in Nagasaki. In the years that followed, many of the survivors would face leukemia, cancer, or other terrible side effects from the radiation. Five to six years after the bombings, the incidence of leukemia increased noticeably among survivors. After about a decade, survivors began suffering from thyroid, breast, lung and other cancers at higher than normal