Torture and War Essay

Submitted By elchaka
Words: 1408
Pages: 6
Open Document
Torture and Just War So much for diplomacy and the using of non-violence to retrieve valuable information from criminals. Our world today is much different from what it was so many hundred years ago when torture was seen as something proper and necessary that was the basis for people telling the truth or risking getting killed or seriously injured in the process. Nowadays there is so much red tape and bureaucracies that individuals have to respect before even thinking of perusing making it near impossible for the truth to reveal itself. But with so much war looming and violent dangers to society its time to reconsider old methods of extracting whats important from the subject. Anyhow, many people continue to be reluctant in accepting and taking into account that torture as Darelle Cole puts it is “as an act of state-sponsored force to gain information crucial to the well-being of the common good, should be consid- ered as a tactic of war, and therefore scrutinized in terms of just war theory” (Cole 26). Furthermore, it is existential for us as a society to come together and use torture as a resource to crack down on terrorists as well as captured criminals who have crucial intelligence that could lead to the capture of “bigger fishes.” With many people using violence as the last resort for getting what they want its time to re-examine that principle and see how it applies in terms of reaching the truth. In other words, its enhanced interrogation that is morally acceptable because of the simple cruel nature of war. But there are sill people that continue to belief that the ends of torturing individuals for their information does not justify the means as expressed by the Just War theorists. Moving forward the Just War theorists’s heat is very much fueled by Jeremy Bentham’s beliefs who “gives the classic utilitarian argument for torture when he argues that torture is possibly justifiable as the lesser of two evils” (Cole 26). This goes with the idea that if torture has to be used to save innocent lives it should be done without hesitation. Even so, there are those individuals who believe “torture contradicts the golden rule” which in brief implores people should treat others how they would individually like to be treated. The flaw in this argument is that fails to understand that “we take advantage of superior strength all the time in war—that is typically how we win” since the golden rule says that we should turn down from employing our superior strength on our enemies. Opponents also argue “whatever is opposed to life itself, such as any type of murder . . . whatever violates the integrity of the human person, such as mutilation, torments inflicted on body or mind, attempts to coerce the will itself . . . are infamies indeed” (Cole 30). In other words those acts of torture are a moral insult against human dignity which is an action that goes against God and the good that he instills in every human. Yet, people are not convinced that torture is some type of violation inherited from creation making it evil to use for the benefit of society. Additionally, “torture need not be used “solely” as a means to an individual’s own ends, but the ends of the common good of relatively just state” (Cole 31). Cole then brings the argument that above else torture harms the torturer just as much the “victim” which he doesn’t agree with it at all. John Perry goes further to say that torture gives the torturer some time of power that makes them to actions that will deprave them ultimately at the end. Its wrong to say that because acts of force aren't done out of a sense of hatred and revenge but committed by a soldier would come from a sense of duty and love of neighbor. Torture like “soldiering should always be the kind of job done with professional detachment toward the objects of force that would preclude the kind of intense emotional involvement that could lead to vicious acts” (Cole 33). Moreover, its important that this is all
Show More

Related Documents: Torture and War Essay

Incarceration, Torture And War In The US

Jacob Laney 5/1/15 English Mrs. Elliott Incarceration, Torture and War in the U.S. The majority of Americans twenty years ago would agree that unwarranted, mass incarceration, torture and perpetual war are products of a morally corrupt society. The view of this in our society has changed drastically since. A façade has been set up to cultivate false fear in the minds of our population. We are indoctrinated to unquestioningly fear what our government deems as terrorism, mass drug addiction…

Words 1058 - Pages 5

War On Terrorism And The Ethics Of Torture

War on Terrorism and the Ethics of Torture For many years terrorism has played a major part in American history, dating back as far as the late 20th century. They're many parts to understand when exploring and understanding terrorism, such as ethical boundaries of counterterrorism operations, morality target killings, and the use of torture while dealing with a terrorist. When discussing terrorism, understand that they are two different types, domestic and international. Although domestic…

Words 1773 - Pages 8

Essay on Perspectives and Torture on the War of Terrorism

Perspectives on Torture and the War on Terrorism Perspectives on Torture and the War on Terrorism Yoo defined torture as an act committed upon a person with specific intensions to cause him/her severe mental or physical pain or suffering by another person acting under the color of law, and has his custody or physical control. This pain must not be as a result of lawful sanctions. This type of definition that Yoo uses is “threatening” and is unlawful. President Obama however…

Words 743 - Pages 3

Essay on Torture: Abuse and Senator Mccain

First Name, Last Name Essay #2 - Torture Discussion Essay Instructor, Margaret Anderson ENG-111 Torture – An Unnecessary Evil At issue are whether torture should be permissible, and what the implications of said permissibility are to foreign nations. For this discussion, “torture” is defined as a non-lethal means of extracting information from a suspected malefactor for the purpose of using that information to save innocent lives in an emergency situation, or “ticking time bomb” scenario…

Words 1582 - Pages 7

Examples Of PTSD In The Kite Runner

Living through war can impact one’s life emotionally. One serious way it can impact someone emotionally is by giving them PTSD. The Mayo clinic explains that “PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) is a disorder characterized by failure to recover after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event such as war” (Mayo Clinic). It causes events such as serious road accidents, violent personal assaults, such as sexual assault, mugging or robbery. One example of PTSD impacting someone is in the book…

Words 523 - Pages 3

Torture Essay

Schutt April Van Camp ENC1101_Tuesday/Thursday 10/15/2011 The Truth behind Torture Acts of interrogation or torture towards humans has many perspectives. There are many viewpoints that people have on the circumstances in which torture is necessary or unnecessary. Torture without reason is inhumane and uncalled for. People that torture others who are innocent deserve absolutely no respect or positive recognition. Although, torture may be reasonable in situations like enemy hostage scenes or ticking-time-bomb…

Words 712 - Pages 3

Torture In The Military

Basically torture can be broken down into two sub categories: punitive and interrogational. Santucci (2008) defines interrogational torture as having the intent of extracting information that is considered pertinent to a higher cause from the detainee. This is the type of torture that would describe the purpose of its use by the U. S. in the War on Terror. Punitive torture is used to discipline or persuade the opinions of someone or a group of people (Santucci, 2008). This type of torture is most…

Words 707 - Pages 3

Walzer Review Essay

and Society February 15, 2013 War has always been an issue of high discussion due to all the consequences that follow the choices associated when dealing with war. The question we must deal with is; is national self-defense a goal that can justify launching a war, despite the large-scale killing that it is sure to ensue? This question brings many different opinions from both sides of the spectrum and different views. Walzer expresses his view of justifiable wars, while a pacifist like Gandhi, would…

Words 1524 - Pages 7

Michael Walzer's Just War Theory

times. “Just War” has been used to justify and sometimes rationalize wars throughout history, by invoking its test of morality. Today, “Just War” theory is useful to scrutinize and critique wars in our time. Walzer states the reason for having a theory of “Just War” in a way that is hard to argue with is one, the moral reality of war is not fixed by the actual activities of the soldiers but by the opinions of humankind. Second, the truth is that one of the things most of us want, even in war, is to act…

Words 1464 - Pages 6

Pros And Cons Of Torture

Torture is more accepted in today’s society than years ago and is highly inefficient way of obtaining information from prisoners. While many people claim that torture is an effective way of obtaining information, multiple events tell us otherwise. While there have been a few occasions where torture has worked, most of the people being tortured, specifically war criminals, do not reveal any information and often give off false information. Torture is not the best option in extracting information…

Words 258 - Pages 2