When students and the population in general are restricted from giving their opinion or discussing what is in mind, they build up anger/frustration and anxiety of what can be said. When improvement is done in hopes to alleviate this anxiety and people are pushed to give their opinion rather than stay withdrawn, they become less stressed out and angry. Thinking in a distorted manner is more commonly used than asking students to think critically. It causes them to think they have done something wrong and that an apology is needed somewhere during the discussion, when they were just giving their opinion. If somebody is allowed to be offended and require limited discussion topics, it isn’t really fair. Why should part of the population be coddled while the rest are punished for their beliefs and statements? This new way of handling education is rooted from the internet/social media, particularly blogs. People make posts to fuel the fire of trigger warnings to make the use of them stretch farther, and these beliefs get brought into the school setting. Most professors, surveys say, that they use trigger warnings to avoid losing their career. They fear that if they approach certain topics without warning and a student complains, it might end their professional contract. The majority of surveys state that trigger warnings will have a negative effect on classroom dynamics and make academic freedom impossible to