In the article, ‘Does sport hunting benefit conservation?’, (By Andrew J. Loveridge, Jonathan C. Reynolds and E. J. Milner-Gulland) states “Some hunters spend extravagantly and travel extensively (PACEC 2000), and may pay high fees for syndicate membership, logistical support and guides. They may pay extremely high prices to shoot spectacular species.” For example from the article ‘The $200 million question: How much does trophy hunting really contribute to African communities?’ by Roderick Campbell, it was mentioned that a 21 day lion hunt could possibly cost between $20,000 and $70,000 from the hunting party (Lindsey et al. 2012); but it would be even more difficult to assess how much local communities actually benefits, without understanding the variety of stakeholders involved and where this money goes. Also, the craziest part about this particular activity is that some trophy hunters even set up auctions to drive in all sorts of money. For example, the article Hunting – the murderous business, “…California Department of Fish and Wildlife received $45,000 from the sale of a killing tag for California Desert Bighorn Sheep, sold at the 41st Safari Club International Convention in Reno, Nevada. Getting the trophy carcass is an unwritten guarantee.” Most auction buyers are mainly entertaining the killing of wildlife animals is either to decorate their house or to resell them or even display them in a museum. Also most of the income barely goes to local communities and towards conservation. In the article, Hunters Say Trophy Hunting Helps Animals. Here's Why They're Wrong by Ameena Schelling, stated, “Big game hunters say they help support local communities and conservation efforts by paying for big game hunts. However, while hunters pay roughly $200 million each year for big game hunts in Africa, only around 3 percent