Thirty respondents (16.57459) claimed that most were unaware of the availability of the free services offered, considering their limited knowledge about UHCL. According to residents of Pico, some health centers are not actively enforcing the law, and some programs are not implemented. Residents of Poblacion also pointed out that, due to a lack of information, most are unaware of the limited scope of UHCL coverage. They also added that the coverage of what they can get is still unclear. Familiarity with the program. Four respondents (1.104972) stated that they still find it difficult to familiarize themselves with the service coverage of UHCL. Pico residents indicated that not everyone is familiar with UHCL, while Betag residents mentioned that people have insufficient knowledge of the law's benefits and existence. Residents of Lubas also supported the idea that most of them were unfamiliar with the programs. Misunderstanding of the law of the United States. Two of the respondents (1.104972) claimed they misunderstood the law's provisions. According to the resident of Betag, an explanation about UHCL seems insufficient. A resident of Pico said it was unclear and questionable whether PhilHealth was needed before assistance could be provided. The data shows that a lack of awareness can make most of the residents unfamiliar with the benefits they could have. Without adequate awareness among the residents, it can hinder their ability to avail themselves of the services offered and delay the successful implementation of the law. In addition, misunderstandings about PhilHealth membership create a misconception that may result in residents not trying the programs made available to them. This implies that the residents are still confused and questionable about the process under UHCL. It was unclear to them what they should do before they could avail of the program. This corroborates the study of