Utilitarianism actions are judged right and wrong solely on their consequence, and in order to assess this consequence, the only thing that matters is the amount of happiness and unhappiness caused and by calculating happiness and unhappiness caused, nobody’s happiness counts any more than anybody else’s. Utilitarian ethics are the most common form of ethics used today; it has advanced because two needs have been met by it. Firstly, is the end-based thinking which is common and people have sought to improve and perfect what is achieved by their effort. And secondly, is the speed of life which has made single-criterion solutions interesting toward quick and successful problem solving.
In solving this dilemma, considering …show more content…
Then being homeless, will not also produce a greater good to the society because, even if he survives the organ transplant, he may as well die of infections. This is a personal judgement because, “utilitarianism was also seen as unconventional and even subversive as it opposed the legal forms of justice that punished offenders rather than seeking to rehabilitate them for the happiness of the society” (Ruggiero, …show more content…
That means all things being equal, he will reach his individual happiness, but he will be the first to leave the earth, and he wouldn’t contribute much to the society. When relating to his job, he can be easily replaced, and there are not a lot of impact, his job can give to the society. According to Aristotle, “Ends-based theories anticipate outcomes and give opportunities to measure the quality of decisions after they are made by the happiness that was actually delivered. This, then, gives a secondary opportunity to learn from the evaluation of decisions and improve decision making for the future and improvement of subsequent outcomes” (Ruggiero,