Were the Locarno treaties a triumph? Essay

Submitted By Jade-Green
Words: 1114
Pages: 5
Open Document
“The Locarno Treaties of 1925 were a Triumph for British Foreign Policy” Agree or disagree? (24 marks)

Many historians would disagree with the idea that the Treaty of Locarno could be called a British triumph, but rather an accomplishment which benefited many European allies whilst leaving some major issues unresolved.

In September 1925, German foreign minister, Gustav Stresemann organised a meeting, in Locarno, Switzerland, between representatives from France (Aristide Briand), Italy, Great Britain (Austin Chamberlain), Czechoslovakia, Poland and Belgium, initially to discuss their frontiers in Western Europe, though all were anxious to improve the rising tensions between France and Germany after the French had occupied the Ruhr, the industrial heart of Germany over a dispute regarding Germany’s reparation payment of telegraph poles was once again delayed. Eventually, all representatives signed what became the Treaty of Locarno, which had ensured the allowance of Germany into the League of Nations in 1926, Germany’s promise not to attack France again and the Rhineland wouldn’t be remilitarised or fortified.

One of the ways in which Locarno was a triumph for British foreign policy would be because of the joy and happiness that spread over Europe as a result of the newly-found hope and chance for peace after the negotiations made in the treaty; this being the reasoning behind the term ‘Locarno honeymoon’, which can be used to describe the state of public mood after 1925, until the Wall Street Crash in 1929. Chamberlain claimed the treaty to be the “dividing line between the years of war and the years of peace”, which further encouraged the belief that there would be no need for war in the near future, allowing people to stop worrying because tensions between the allies and Germany had been dissolved.

On the other hand, it can be argued that actually, the triumph was not entirely Britain’s, but rather majorly Germany and France’s success. This is evident in the fact that France’s borders with Belgium were to be protected from attack, which was supported by Italy and France. This in turn then allowed their political relations to improve through Briand and Stresemann’s growing friendship and frequent work relationship. This reconciliation between nations was one of the fundamental aspects on which their winning of the Nobel Peace Prize was based as it promoted peace within all. France could also consider the treaty a personal triumph as it allowed them to later expand on their newly- found peace by creating the Kellogg- Briand Pact, which decided that war was not to be used as a weapons for settling disputes, giving France a better reputation as it was signed by 15 countries across Europe.
Germany also benefited more than the G.B in the results of Locarno in the fact that France had agreed to dismiss the army from the Rhineland, allowing them to continue production of coal and steel which is responsible for 80% of Germany’s total production of these resources, meaning there economy is able to return its previous state by trading them with other countries, making money to use as reparation payments. Their improved relationship with France is also emphasised in the way in which the French show their support in their reparation payments as they agreed to leave the Ruhr 5 years earlier than they had initially agreed, as a part of the Young Plan in 1929, to extend the amount of time given to pay for the £6.6 billion in reparations, as a result of the treaty of Versailles.

However, though not entirely a triumph for British foreign policy, it can certainly be considered a success in comparison to the discussions that had taken place previously, such as the Geneva Disarmament Conference of Genoa Conference of 1923, in which no acceptable negotiations had been made, Poincare refused to attend and Lloyd George had been brutally criticised for not having prevented the secret alliance that formed in the Rapallo treaty between Russia
Show More

Related Documents: Were the Locarno treaties a triumph? Essay

Essay about Mussolini's Foreign Policy

Mussolini was commiting Italy to deeper and deeper invovlement with Germany, which in the end would ruin him. HITLER’S FOREIGN POLICY What were his aims in Foreign Policy? Was he successful? Hitler aimed to make Germany into a great power again He hoped to achieve this by: a) destroying the hated Versailles settlement b) building up the army c) recovering lost territory such as the Saar…

Words 1909 - Pages 8

Essay about Britain in the War

terms, their only concern was to improve their strategic position for the next war -‘The Second World War grew out of the victories in the first and out of the way these victories were used -The Americans had no concrete war aims, no precise territorial demands and so this made them less eager for an armistice - The treaty was designed to provide security against a new German aggression, yet could only work with the cooperation of the German Government - The important thing was not to prevent German…

Words 4999 - Pages 20

Weimar Republic and Government Essay examples

October 1918, the German navy mutinied. Rebellion spread throughout the country. In November Germany was forced to drop out of the First World War. Kaiser Wilhelm II abdicated and fled the country. A new republic was declared. In January 1919, elections were held for a new Reichstag and in February 1919, in the town of Weimar, a new government was agreed. Freidrich Ebert was elected President of the new Republic. Germany did not just get a new government. The Allies made sure that Germany got a different…

Words 2568 - Pages 11