Procedural justice, moreover, includes the rules and regulations of the law. Procedural justice determines ones guilt, decide punishment, or resolve disputes. Fuller (1969: 39) explored the weakness of law and described ways that the procedure of law may fail to achieve justice. (Pollock) …show more content…
Many believe the severity of the punishment should be equal to the severity of the crime. If someone commits robbery, the just punishment should be at most one year in prison, regardless of the value of the items taken whereas; someone who commits murder in an armed robbery should be sentenced to life in prison and return or pay the victims back for the stolen or damaged property. The same goes for someone who is committed of embezzlement. Someone convicted of embezzling one million-dollars deserves a sentence of jail or prison time, sometimes even both depending on the value or type of property embezzled. The felon must also pay a fine. Each punishment should be morally and equally just for the crime committed instead of being cruel and