Essay about Whats the difference between a writ habeas

Submitted By Bailey-Marquez
Words: 753
Pages: 4
Open Document
What's the difference between a writ and an appeal?
Writs usually are considered to be extraordinary remedies, meaning they are permitted only when the defendant has no other adequate remedy, such as an appeal. In other words, a defendant may take a writ to contest a point that the defendant is not entitled to raise on appeal. As a general rule, this applies to issues that are not apparent in the record of the case itself (such as when an attorney fails to investigate a possible defense).
Any one of the following reasons, for example, may prohibit an appeal (and justify a writ):
The defense did not lodge a timely objection at the time of the alleged injustice (but should have).
A final judgment has not yet been entered in the trial court, but the party seeking the writ needs relief at once to prevent an injustice or unnecessary expense.
The matter is urgent. (Writs are heard more quickly than appeals, so defendants who feel wronged by actions of the trial judge may need to take a writ to obtain an early review by a higher court.)
The defendant has already lodged an unsuccessful appeal (defendants may file multiple writs but the right to appeal is limited to one). But filing a writ that simply mimics an unsuccessful appeal is a frivolous writ and will be dismissed immediately.

What is a writ of habeas corpus?
Defendants who want to challenge the legality of their imprisonment -- or the conditions in which they are being imprisoned -- may seek help from a court by filing an application for what is known as a "writ of habeas corpus."
A writ of habeas corpus (literally to "produce the body") is a court order to a person (prison warden) or agency (institution) holding someone in custody to deliver the imprisoned individual to the court issuing the order. Many state constitutions provide for writs of habeas corpus, as does the U.S. Constitution, which specifically forbids the government from suspending writ proceedings except in extraordinary times -- such as war.
Known as "the Great Writ," habeas corpus gives citizens the power to get help from courts to keep government and any other institutions that may imprison people in check. In many countries, police and military personnel, for example, may take people and lock them up for months -- even years -- without charging them, and those imprisoned have no avenue, no legal channel, by which to protest or challenge the imprisonment.
The writ of habeas corpus gives jailed suspects the right to ask an appellate judge to set them free or order an end to improper jail conditions, and thereby ensures that people in this country will not be held for long times in prison in violation of their rights. Of course, the right to ask for relief is not the same as the right to get relief; courts are very stingy with their writs.
Potential
Show More

Related Documents: Essay about Whats the difference between a writ habeas

Rahmatullah V Secretary Of State For International Law

INTERNATIONAL LAW Edited by Dominic McGoldrick and Sarah Williams SELLING THE PASS: HABEAS CORPUS, DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS AND THE PROTECTION OF LIBERTY AND SECURITY OF PERSONS DETAINED ABROAD Abstract On 31 October 2012 the Supreme Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment in Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs and Secretary of State for Defence [2012] UKSC 48. The case concerns an application for habeas corpus brought by a citizen of Pakistan originally detained by the United Kingdom…

Words 7655 - Pages 31

2009 Lincoln Supplement Lesson Essay

LESSON ABRAHAM LINCOLN (1809–1865) Sixteenth president of the United States. Photographed by Alexander Gardner at Washington, D.C., on November 8, 1863, eleven days before delivering the Gettysburg Address. (Photograph with oil paint colorization.) ▼ WHAT WAS ABRAHAM LINCOLN'S LEGACY TO AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM AND CITIZENSHIP? The two hundredth anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s birthday, February 12, 1809, provides an occasion for teaching and learning about this great man’s contributions to American…

Words 4701 - Pages 19

Scarpelli Case Summary

A year later, there is the case of Gagon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778 (1973), the court had held that the parolees will have limited to receive counsel within the revocation proceedings and with that, the hearing body will have to determine, with a case-by-case basis, and that is whether the counsel should be afforded. While there is a need for it not to be granted with all of the cases, where the counsel should be provided where it is after having been informed of his right, by the request of the…

Words 1313 - Pages 6

Abolitionists: The Second Great Awakening

position on religious grounds. The issues that abolitionists brought up helped to begin the controversy that eventually led to the Civil War. Since almost all abolitionists were from the North, the movement also helped to separate and define the differences between the North and the South. B is for Bull Run, or Manassas, was the place where the first major battle of the Civil War took place. Most thought that a Union victory would put a…

Words 2176 - Pages 9

EXAM 2 Essay

-street level bureaucrats= post office, cops, teachers, garbage collectors 2-specialization: individuals are specialists in their field in specialized offices 3- Clear cut responsibilities= “sub- descriptions” so that people know exactly what they’re doing 4-standard operating procedures= system of rules which clearly guide official behavior 5- Hiring based on merit, not political party= based on qualifications/ sills to do jobs BUREAUCRATIC SLACK: a situation in which bureaucrats do…

Words 1917 - Pages 8

history Essay

THE EFFECTS OF WORLD WAR I ON POLITICAL AND ETHNIC MINORITIES As you read in Chapter 21 “An Emerging World Power,” the government clamped down hard on those who dissented from the war and on those who held radical or unpopular opinions. In this assignment you will explore how political and ethnic minorities were treated during and after World War I. Definition: A “minority” is anyone who is not like or does not agree with the majority. It does not have to mean an ethnic or racial minority…

Words 2193 - Pages 9

Death Penalty Essay

same period was “356 (1.4%) with a population of 6.3 million” people (disastercenter.com). An analysis of the murder rate in Virginia second behind Texas in number of executions from 1976-2004 (94/944) and neighboring Maryland show no significant difference. In 2007 the murder rate in Virginia was “406 with a 7.7 million population” (fbi.gov) and in Maryland for the same period it was “553 with a population of 5.6 million people” (fbi.gov). It is also pertinent to compare states with high and low…

Words 1963 - Pages 8

Government note Chap. 1-8 Essay

Full Faith & Credit Question 22 Article V of the Constitution creates what process? Amendment Question 23 Article VI states that this is the “supreme law of the land.” Constitution Question 24 Article IV gives the power to admit new states to the union to whom? Congress
 Question 25 If two-thirds of Congress approves a Constitutional amendment, what proportion of the states must do so? Three-fourths Quiz 3 Question 1 At the heart of a democratic…

Words 4055 - Pages 17

History: President of the United States and Executive Branch Essay

Chapter 10 1.Following the 2008 campaign, the Democratic party was in control. *During the 2010 midterm elections the Republicans took over. 2.Midterm Elections: congressional elections that do not coincide with a presidential election; also called off-year elections. 3.Primary Election is where candidates are selected for the general election. 4. Open Primary is an election in which the voter can wait until the day of the primary to choose which party to enroll in to select candidates for…

Words 3548 - Pages 15

Essay about Review Chapter 14 And 15

Democrats, who had previously dominated politics, much like the power struggle that existed in the American Revolution. James Randall 1960s-1970s: The Civil War was a result of the Blundering Generation. He believes the North and South had no differences that would require war, saying that slavery was crumbling and would have died out with some time. The Civil War could only be accounted for by the political ineptitude of leaders in the government. North’s advantages the North has more: Population…

Words 5898 - Pages 24