The timeline is of outmost importance in framing a response to the question on the ethics of taking cells from patient Henrietta Lacks. The diagnosis of invasive cervical carcinomas for Henrietta in 1951 was prior to laws and regulations on “informed consent”. Henrietta had signed an “Operation Permit” at the time of her procedure. Therefore, the acceptability of removing cells from her or any other patient in the name of science and research was ethical at that time. The events that followed the discovery of Henrietta’s cancerous cells being immortal is a new matter entirely. The hospital or any medical professional involved should have never released her name or medical records. …show more content…
The operation permit reads “I hereby give consent to the staff of The John Hopkins Hospital to perform any operative procedures and under any anesthetic either local or general that they may deem necessary in the proper surgical care and treatment of: __________” (p 31). At this time, Doctor George Gey, head of tissue culture research at Hopkins was working with Dr. Richard Wesley TeLinda described in Cast of Characters of the book quotes “one of the top cervical cancer experts in the country at the time of Henrietta’s diagnosis. His research involved taking tissue samples from Henrietta and other at John Hopkins” (Skloot, p 331). The point is that this was standard operation procedure at the time and by signing the hospitals “operation permit” cell collection was standard operating procedures for John Hopkins Medical Research Hospital. The prescribed treatment of radium and cell collection was part of the primitive administrative and surgical procedures for its