Not in the sense that they wouldn’t take care of their children, but in the sense that they will be the wage-earners for the family. Because of this they would have to spend more time away from the child, in turn creating specific jobs for nannies and daycares. The mother would still tend to the house-hold but also work outside of the home. They often times worked harder and longer than the men simply because of the fact that the work day was not over once they left the drudgery of the mill. Once home, they were still expected to clean, cook, and tend to the children. They were proof of the radical change in the economic position of women because now they had the freedom to choose how their life and what possessions they owned instead of depending solely on the …show more content…
According the Department of Labor in the year 2010, of the 123 million women who were 16 or older, over 72 million were participants in the workforce. That’s 58.6% of women working hard and thriving from the bravery of the women before them. Without their actions, I don’t believe America would be as great as it is because us women are the core of the life. Without us, the United States of America wouldn’t be as beautiful or intelligent. I believe we are forever indebted to the women of the progressive era because without them we would still be taught to been seen and not heard and seriously what kind of world would that be?
Works Cited
1. Open Collections Program: Working Women, 1800-1930. Harvard University Library.
2. Orleck, Annalise. Common Sense and a Little Fire: Women and Working-Class Politics in the United States, 1900-1965. University of North Carolina Press, 1995.
3. Foner, Eric. Voices of Freedom: A Documentary History. New York: W.W. Norton, 2014
4. Cooney, Jr. Robert P.J. Winning the Vote: The Triumph of the American Woman Suffrage Movement. American Graphic Press, 2005.
5. "Quick Stats on Women Workers, 2010." United States Department of Labor. U.s Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2010. Web. 25 Apr.