A call for Liberty Essay

Submitted By brinkley_anne99
Words: 1156
Pages: 5
Open Document
A Call for Liberty
By Brinkley Branch
The Fourth Amendment: The right of the people to be, secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Thirteen years ago most Americans thought they were living in the most secure environment on the planet. National Security and Privacy appeared to be unharmed until one frightful day when two planes crashed into the world trade center, killing 3,000 people. It was the most unimaginable thing that could happen, that one Tuesday morning.
After 9/11 everything crumbled. No one would have guessed that terrorists would have infiltrated our country and that soon the “War against Terror” would begin. But did all of this REALLY happen just under the noses of our government? Was our National Security THAT weak? What were the long term consequences of this attack? These and many other questions were flying around our country that year.
Now, 12 years later we have seen the aftermath, the NSA has taken it into their own hands to tap our phone lines and read our emails, to save our social network files and monitor us through our internet connected cameras. What is the balance between security and privacy? Should we really worry about privacy if we have nothing to hide? I think so.
If you think that you have nothing to hide then would you strip naked and let me take photos of you to post all over the internet? Would you like me to look through every text message or private email that you have ever sent? Will you bring out your credit card report for last year? Tax forms? Even if you say that I could do all of these things there is an underlying problem with this argument. There is a mental connection between privacy and a form of secrecy. For example, the University of South Carolina law professor Ann Bartow argues that in order to have a real resonance, privacy problems must "negatively impact the lives of living, breathing human beings beyond simply provoking feelings of unease.” She says that privacy needs more "dead bodies”, and that privacy's "lack of blood and death, or at least of broken bones and buckets of money, distances privacy harms from other [types of harm]."
Bartow’s description of privacy aligns with the nothing-to-hide argument. And it also makes since that people would be more reactive to blood and death matters than less threatening types of harm. Privacy is rarely lost in one fell swoop. It is usually eroded over time, little bits dissolving almost imperceptibly until we finally begin to notice how much is gone. When the government starts monitoring the phone numbers people call, many may shrug their shoulders and say, "Ah, it's just numbers, that's all.” Then the government might start monitoring some phone calls. "It's just a few phone calls, nothing more.” The government might install more video cameras in public places. "So what? Some more cameras watching in a few more places. No big deal.” The increase in cameras might lead to a more elaborate network of video surveillance. Satellite surveillance might be added to help track people's movements. The government might start analyzing people's bank records. "It's just my deposits and some of the bills I pay—no problem.” The government may then start combing through credit-card records, then expand to Internet-service providers' records, health records, employment records, and more. Each step may seem incremental, but after a while, the government will be watching and knowing everything about us.
"My life's an open book," people might say. "I've got nothing to hide.” But now the government has large logs of everyone's activities, interests, reading habits, finances, and health. What if the government leaks the information to the public?
Show More

Related Documents: A call for Liberty Essay

What Does Liberty Symbolize In The Scarlet Letter

In the book, The Scarlet Letter, Nathaniel Hawthorne plays with the idea of personal liberty. Personal liberty is when someone makes their own decision but still acts with accordance to the law and rules of society. An example of when this occured is when Dimmesdale took to the scaffold and released his secret. One could tell personal liberty is present because when Dimmesdale took the scaffold, it took the public by surprise. In fact “the crown was in tumult” (128). The crowd in this moment did…

Words 177 - Pages 1

Terrorism and Secretary Norman Mineta Essay

In the wake of the tragic events of Tuesday, it is critically important that Americans not let themselves be goaded into acceptance of new infringements of civil liberties, some of which have already, not 24 hours later, been proposed or imposed. 50 years ago, Mao Tse Tung explained that the greatest success in destabilizing or degrading a nation could be had by stimulating, through terrorist means and otherwise, reactive countermeasures from the existing government. Such countermeasures either…

Words 1013 - Pages 5

Nation of Cowards Essay

safeguarding your life in the hands of others” (Snyder). Being unable to shield ourselves will leave us defenseless. Our lack of protection means we will have to rely on the police to keep us from harm. But how effective will that be? "’Call for a cop, call for an ambulance, and call for a pizza. See who shows up first’" (Snyder) Although cops roam the streets all throughout the day, there's no guarantee they will be around when you need them. If an act of assault happens, the culprit can be gone by the time…

Words 1267 - Pages 6

Patrick Henry Speech Summary

Patrick Henry's speech, known as "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death," has rightfully earned its place in American history as one of the most influential calls to arms. Delivered on March 23, 1775, at the Second Virginia Convention, Henry's speech was steeped in emotion and conviction. It spoke to the colonists' deep yearning for freedom and their desire to assert their rights as free men and women. Henry's words were powerful and resonated with the colonists, inspiring them to fight for independence…

Words 250 - Pages 1

John Stuart Mill Liberty

his “Introduction,” on Liberty, discusses the shortcomings of modern Liberty. According to Mill, Liberty has lost much of its meaning because men, in society, tend to degrade their Liberty for the sake of some lesser more comfortable thing; which they, unfortunately according to Mill, call Liberty. This form of Liberty, which Mill has identified as an undermined sense of the word, has manifested itself in two distinct ways throughout various periods; the first, was ‘Liberty’ which simply instated…

Words 657 - Pages 3

Tomasi Market Democracy Summary

Tomasi promotes a “hybrid theory” of mixing both classic liberal and high liberals to create a concept he calls “market democracy” (Tomasi, 50). Tomasi is presenting for a liberal conception of government, where there is a “thick conception of liberties” (Tomasi, 57). He uses multiple philosophers on the side of classic liberals and high liberals to present his points about why economic liberties are basic. Tomasi believes that this use of both theories will promote a form of economy that will use the…

Words 812 - Pages 4

Letter From An Iranian Jail

want rights for everyone, some may call it equality, but while this is true, I call it a life. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. I cannot just sit around and let these injustices roam free around our country and around the world, and deny us, the human race, our God- given rights. My rights weren’t honored when the government made every woman wear a veil and couldn’t express ourselves, this right is an infraction to my right to liberty. Not only this reason, but also being…

Words 447 - Pages 2

President of the United States and Constitutional Rights Essay

agrees with different amounts of liberties being taken for different amounts of security, we can all agree something needs to be changed. One of our founding fathers has a powerful and famous quote that says If we were to change it for the better, I believe we would need to limit how they can listen to our phone calls or read or messages. I think they should make sure it is actually a matter of national security by only starting their surveillance until a call or email or text is sent somewhere…

Words 342 - Pages 2

9/11 Research Paper

would give up essential liberty, to purchase temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety”(Benjamin Franklin, 1755). People cannot have both absolute privacy and absolute security. The two cannot co-exist. Instead, the government must make its citizens safe while adhering to their rights as Americans. But after the events of 9/11, the government has seemed to stop caring about the latter, instead utilizing America’s fear of the terrorism to take away civil liberties and pretend citizens are…

Words 752 - Pages 4

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Patrick Henry's Speech

his famous speech now dubbed, “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death,” he could be considered almost treasonous to the British king. Yet, Patrick Henry proved himself to be a most respectable patriot, and an incredible orator when addressing that group of highly influential colonial leaders while forging the future of a brand new nation. Henry knew his audience, and played on there deep biblical backgrounds to convince those in attendance that his outrageous call for revolt, could not be argued. Patrick…

Words 1847 - Pages 8