Essay on Criticism for Max Weber’s Bureaucracy

Submitted By iivy1901
Words: 4943
Pages: 20
Open Document
Criticism for Max Weber’s Bureaucracy

Written by Dr. Wasim Al-Habil
College of Commerce
The Islamic University of Gaza

Beginning with Max Weber, bureaucracies have been regarded as mechanisms that rationalize authority and decision-making in society. Yet subsequent theorists have questioned the rationality of bureaucracies. Which features of modern-day public bureaucracies are rational? Which are not? Buttress your argument with citations from organization and/or public administration theories.

Introduction:
Max Weber’s work about bureaucracy, translated into English in 1946, was one of the major contributions that has influenced the literature of public administration. However, Van Riper (1997) argues that the work of Weber on bureaucracy has no influence on American PA until the 1950’s. The word bureaucracy is derived from two words; “bureau” and “Kratos.” While the word “bureau” refers to the office the Greek suffix “kratia or kratos” means power or rule. Thus we use the word “bureaucracy” to refer to the power of the office (Hummel, 1998, 307). “Bureaucracy” is rule conducted from a desk or office, i.e. by the preparation and dispatch of written documents and electronic ones. Bureaucracy is borrowed by the field of public administration (PA) from the field of sociology. It was borrowed by PA in much a similar way that practices of business were borrowed from the field of business administration and economics. Weber (1946) presents bureaucracy as both a scientific and generic model that can work in both the public and private sectors (Rainey, 1996). For example, Weber asserts that:
The bureaucratic structure goes hand with the concentration of the material means of management in the hands of master. This concentration occurs, for instance in a well-known and typical fashion, in development of big capitalist enterprise, which finds their essential characteristics in this process. A corresponding process occurs in public organization (1946, 221).

This belief in science was evident in Max Weber’s rational-legal authority, which became the defining feature of organizational structures, especially government bureaucracies, to this day. It steered organizational setups to rational based considerations, which are in line with the science of administration idea. In other words, Weber’s bureaucracy consists of the traditional way of thinking in public administration that relied on the same “ingredients” to reform public administration based on the science of administration (Thompson, 2005).
This essay explores the nature of Weber’s bureaucracy and its influence on the PA discourse. It explains the reaction to Weber’s concept of bureaucracy and its combustion with capitalist and democratic values. In addition, the essay reflects the rational and irrational areas that can be traced in the literature of public organizations and public administration theories. It concludes by presenting an objective view of bureaucracy and its implementing implications in a democratic society like the United States.
Rationality of Weber’s Bureaucracy:
Weber defines bureaucracy as “the means of carrying community action over into rationally ordered social action… an instrument for socializing relations of power, bureaucracy has been and is a power instrument of the first order.” Some scholars (Friedrich, 1940; Finer, 1941; Simon, 1947; Shafritz and Hyde,1997; and Marshall in Ventriss, 2000) argue that public administration is a field of control; control of public administrators, control of people, control of inputs, and control of outputs. All these kinds of controls seek to achieve one main goal which is to meet the people’s needs and expectations in an efficient way. According to Weber (1946), bureaucracy “is, from a purely technical point of view, capable of attaining the highest degree of efficiency and is in this sense formally that most rational known means of carrying out imperative control over human beings” (337).
Weber argues that
Show More

Related Documents: Essay on Criticism for Max Weber’s Bureaucracy

Foucault's Panopticon

Linking the classic and post-modern sociologists is a great intellectual temptation for the social scientist. Indeed, Max Weber and Michel Foucault’s similar focus on manifestations of power and rationality invite comparison, with some going so far as to view Weber as an outright precursor to Foucault (O’Neil, 1986, p. 43). However, doing so risks muddying the complexities of Weber and Foucault’s conceptualisations. Weber sees power, for example, as one of many forces in a multidimensional framework…

Words 1652 - Pages 7

Essay on social thought

time of unparalleled social change that the process of modernization began. In conclusion, the enlightenment not only championed change and reform at the expense of churches and the monarchies but challenged traditional institutions too. However criticism of how the enlightenment contributed to the feeling of loneliness and lack of meaning arose. Critics believed that from the enlightenment's emphasis on individualism and personal rights, many lost the feeling of responsibility and community involvement…

Words 1466 - Pages 6

Is Classical Sociology Still Relevant Today? Essay example

Choose any one concept or argument developed within classical sociology. Critically evaluate the use made of this concept or argument by contemporary sociology in trying to understand a current social issue This essay looks at the argument taken from a classical sociologist called Weber, throughout this essay it explains rationalization and how it has become modernized using Ritzer to explain this by demonstrating his McDonaldization theory. The theory will be clarified by contemporary sociologists…

Words 1239 - Pages 5

Is It Possible To Build Better Bureaucracies

Is it possible to build better bureaucracies? Introduction The conception of bureaucracy is one of the most dominant notions in both organization theory and social science. It plays a significant role in modern society. (Clawson, 1980) Ever since the basic characteristics of bureaucracy were formulated by Max Weber, it has been suffered from derogatory remarks and harsh criticism and from various perspectives. For example, feminists such as Kathy Fergusson (1984), liberals such as Mills (1951)…

Words 3211 - Pages 13

Who Am I ? Essay

Who am I? By Sache Priester Final Paper Sociological Theory Introduction Who am I? Hmm, sometimes I think I just don’t know. When I was a little kid, I wanted to be what I called “ambulance”. It wasn’t until I could really understand what that meant but I wanted to save lives. But of course, having the imagination I did, I later changed my mind – I want to be a Pediatrician. I had my high school career path down pack. I was going to go to George Mason then go to Medical…

Words 6572 - Pages 27