8th Amendment Against Cruel And Unusual Punishment

Words: 551
Pages: 3

Throughout the United States history, the death penalty has continued to serve as the final form of penalty for serious crimes. Since its creation, capital punishment has been ongoing debate with lawmakers, citizens, and leaders alike. Treason, murder, and arson are some examples of serious crimes that could result in death penalty. The United States Supreme Court has decided that the death penalty is not a violation of the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment; however, the Eighth Amendment does contain certain procedures on how a death penalty should be carried out. The Eighth Amendment should not be banned as a violation of the Eighth Amendment against cruel and unusual punishment because the United States continued to determine that a penalty was be proportional to the crime committed; otherwise the punishment will be a violation of the Eighth Amendment. The Supreme Court must consider three factors that is relative to their crime such as how the jurisdictions punish criminals as well as same crimes and the strictness of the penalty. In today’s society, the federal government, the Armed Forces, and 32 states now allowed the death penalty to be the final …show more content…
Under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution, unnecessary bail is prohibited as well as excessive fines and prohibited to implemented inhumane punishment. Another example of cruel and unusual punishment is by allowing prison guards to use unnecessary excessive force on inmates. For example, in the case of Hudson versus McMillian, the court realized that the prison guards kicked and punched an inmate by leaving him unresponsive, which led to the violation of the Eighth Amendment. Furthermore, the United States Supreme Court have helped to limited restrictions on the use of cruel and unusual punishment throughout the federal and state