Animal Testing Save Life

If you had an illness, such as cancer, would you be okay with animal testing for medical benefit to help save your life? Animal testing is a controversial topic, however, in the past it has benefit human life, government regulations have been set, and could continue to aid in human and animal life. Animal testing for medical purposes has many advantages and should continue to extend a people’s and animal’s lives. Millions of people can benefit from animal research for medical purposes. “Animal studies bridge the knowledge gap between successful in vitro testing and safe human use.” (Saraf). testing There is much debate if animals should be used because they don't have the exact same anatomy, and animals have rights, too. However, animals …show more content…
Dr. Joseph Murray, Nobel Prize winner for the organ transplant, admits that without animal experimentation, he would not have been able to be successful (Sun). By studying a wide range of animals from horses and dogs, scientists have figured our how to treat diphtheria and diabetes. In 1922, the use of dogs for testing helped researched find insulin. This helped them find the cure for diabetes. In todays society with obesity, diabetes has become a substantial problem in the U.S. More than 9.3% of the United States population has diagnosed diabetes. Because of animal testing, doctors are able to treat these millions of people with their diabetes (Balkwill). While animal models may not always be 100% accurate, they can still show a prediction of what the human body might do with that specific surgery or intake of medicine. Vivo testing not only helps with finding vaccines and cures, but they also help with educational benefits. Researchers can learn a great deal about the animals anatomy, grasp knowledge on what animals will work with what experiments. Not only does vivo testing for medical purposes aid in the research for humans, it …show more content…
However, computer modeling does not show as much of the needed information. Computers can’t feel what pain is, so it would not accurately display how the human body would react. “A computer can’t feel pain or have a heart attack,” states Marianne Koch, Health Safety and Research Alliance from New York State (Sun). If computer modeling became an option in the future, scientists would need to do testing animals to enter data into computer. Otherwise, they would be basing the data off of suppositions. Also, technology is always changing. Computers would have to be updated often. Transitioning into computer modeling would be an endless circle of updating and adding data. Changing all the labs into computer testing would be very costly and difficult to change everywhere animals are tested. If all labs were switched to computer modeling, it would cost more money and time to transition than it would to continue testing on animals. Tissue culture is another option. Tissue culture is when medical experimentation is preformed on a little groups of tissues. However, this is not as accurate because it does not show how the whole body will react. Tissue culture would not be as accurate or lead to as many cures and treatments as vivo testing is doing right now (Burnett). Currently, there are no other options instead of vivo testing. If other alternatives that work as efficiently as

Show More

Animal Testing Controversy

Animal Testing Is Necessary

Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

Argument Against Animal Testing

Persuasive Essay: The Influence Of Animal Testing On Animals

Argumentative Paper

Animal Testing Is Inaccurate

Pharmaceutical Testing In The Industry

Should Animal Testing Be Allowed

Why Is Animal Testing Wrong