Schill, President of the University of Oregon, was shouted down by students during his State of the University address in October of this year, he was prompted to compare the students to the fascists of Italy under Mussolini. The students had shut down his speech because they disagreed with his corporate connections, but did they have a right to censor Schill? Howard Gillman and Erwin Cherminsky, dens of Law at the University of California Irvine and Berkeley Schools of Law respectively, argue in the “Chronicle of Higher Education” that the students had used the ‘hecklers veto’ a common tactic, but an unconstitutional one. Simply put: “Individuals do not have the right to prevent others from speaking” and universities have the right to protect speakers at scheduled events. The protester's argument that they should be able to shut down hate speech if the government refuses to do so is simply