Antony Vs Brutus

Words: 670
Pages: 3
Open Document
Mark Antony v.s. Brutus Ever since man has stepped on this earth, people have been labeled with distinctive qualities. These qualities can either define you as superior or inferior. Some qualities were represented by characters that were friends with Julius Caesar. In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the characters Brutus and Mark Anthony showed how you can misuse the marvelous qualities or use them in the right way. The qualities that defined Mark Antony and Brutus were honor, eloquence, intelligence, trust, and friendliness. Mark Antony and Brutus showed their level of eloquence, honor, and intelligence in their speeches after Caesar was stabbed. Both of these characters showed their trust and friendliness through their relationship …show more content…
Both of these characters had varying speaking skills and after Caesar died, they gave speeches that demonstrated their persuasive abilities. Brutus spoke first, and his speech was short and direct. He tried to appeal to the common people’s logic by telling only the truth and he hoped that his facts would state why Caesar shouldn’t have been killed. Mark Antony’s speech was more emotional. He tried to persuade the people that Caesar shouldn’t have been killed by deceiving them. He wept over Caesar’s dead body and, by doing this, he turned the common people against Brutus. When Mark Antony deceived the common people, he revealed to readers that he is not a very honorable man. If he had to gain respect from the people by lying, he did not deserve honor. Brutus, on the other hand, was the most honorable man in the play. He showed honor by telling the truth even if it caused a disturbance in the crowd. Brutus also stated that he would rather die than live without honor. Brutus was an intelligent man for telling the truth instead of misleading the people. He knew that people respond better to leaders who are trustworthy, instead of leaders who are devious. Mark Antony was an intelligent man as well. As he said his speech, he used his skills of persuasion and deception to win over the crowd. Although both characters were intelligent, they …show more content…
Mark Antony was a close ally of Caesar, and he offered him the crown to be the emperor, showing that he trusts his friend to be the leader of many. Brutus was also a close ally and friend to Caesar. Despite his close friendship, Brutus constantly feared Caesar’s ambitions and he did not want him to become the emperor. Brutus ended up not being loyal to Caesar anymore when he learned that Caesar might be the emperor. He gathered up a bunch of conspirators to kill him, showing that Brutus couldn’t be a good friend since he was capable of turning on a friend and even trying to kill them. Mark Antony was always loyal to Caesar. He never turned on Caesar, even through the disorder in their country. By doing this, Mark Antony proved that he could be a good friend or ally to anyone. In the end, Brutus betrayed Caesar by stabbing him in the back, and Mark Antony stayed by his
Show More

Related Documents: Antony Vs Brutus

Brutus Vs Antony Analysis

After Caesar's death, Brutus and Antony give speeches to better their situation. Both speeches caught the attention of all around passerby's. Both speeches gave the crowd's questions to argue about. My Rhetorical Analysis is based on this statement: Brutus's speech did have more rhetorical questions and pronouns to address the audience but his speech was not more persuasive than antony's. Both speeches used Rhetorical question, but Antony's speech had more of an impact towards the audience. In…

Words 358 - Pages 2

Comparing Brutus And Antony's Speeches In Julius Caesar

SPEECHES: Brutus vs Antony Julius Caesar: Act 3, Scene 2 Caesar’s funeral is a key point in the play and is dominated by long speeches by Brutus and Antony. Because the speeches are long and challenging, it is best to view, re-view, read, and analyze. Paraphrasing - Brutus’ Speech THROUGHout the course of brutus’ speech, he makes it known that he didn’t not love caesar but that he loved rome greater than he loved caesar. This shows that brutus has great intellect to balance the rights of the many…

Words 621 - Pages 3

Essay Tragic Hero

Calista Patterson Ms. Bentley Humanities 10 4 March 2015 Julius Caesar Essay Brutus Vs Antony Almost in all of Shakespeare's plays a tragic hero is always identified; a heroic figure that demonstrates a character flaw that leads to their death. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, there have been many disputes about who was the real tragic hero. Over half the people agree that Marcus Brutus was the true tragic hero. However, others have argued and identified Julius Caesar as the real tragic hero…

Words 715 - Pages 3

Antony's Ethos In Julius Caesar

Antony Vs Brutus The tragedy, Julius Caesar, was written by a famous English playwright, William Shakespeare. In this play both speeches given at Caesar’s play contain several examples of rhetoric. Mark Antony’s speech, on the other hand, contained more impacting examples than that of Brutus. Antony used many examples of ethos so he could establish his own and Caesars credibility. For example, Antony tell the people that Caesar “was my friend, faithful and just to me” (3.2.87). Antony was building…

Words 431 - Pages 2

Julius Caesar Good Vs Evil

Good vs. Evil Many characters in Shakespeare's play, “Julius Caesar” arise contradictory perception within the reader’s mind. Caesar, the original Roman dictator, was dear friends with both Brutus and Antony. Until conspirators convince Brutus to murder Caesar, leading Antony, Lepidus, and Octavius to form the triumvirate. From these events, Caesar, Antony, and Brutus can be named; loyal friend, admiral leader, and honorable patriot. But some consider them as a traitorous conspirator, ruthless opportunist…

Words 362 - Pages 2

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech

Antony vs. Brutus Throughout Act Three Scene Two, both Marc Antony and Brutus use rhetoric theme very effectively against the citizens of Rome. Brutus gives the first speech to the citizens and thoroughly explains his reasoning for killing Julius Caesar. He clarifies that he did love Caesar, but slayed him for the good of Rome. After giving his speech, Brutus allows Antony to give his speech as long as he does not blame the conspirators and speaks good of Caesar. Antony reminds the people how…

Words 686 - Pages 3

Barack Obama: A Modern Day Julius Caesar Essay

Julius Caesar vs. President Obama When talking to your audience you want to show them that you care, that you have emotion, and you’re aware of the situations that are going on. In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare one of the main characters named Mark Antony performs all three of these actions in his speech at Caesars funeral. Similar to Mark Antony President Obama also uses these three tasks in his “We Can Be Better” speech he performed in Tucson, Arizona after a tragic shooting had…

Words 817 - Pages 4

William Shakespeare Research Paper

way is that Brutus is more powerful than Cassius and if Brutus was just a pawn in Cassius’ plan then Cassius would be more powerful as the puppet master. Most of the mistakes made by the conspirators were made by Brutus and if Cassius actually had dominance over Brutus, he wouldn’t have been able to devise any decisions in the first place. Making this exchange in authority complicated for Cassius to work with. Consequently, after stating the Cassius believes himself superior to Brutus, Cassius quickly…

Words 1565 - Pages 7

Government Day 1 Essay

Calphurnia and Antony; closest thing to a son Desperation for an heir= male son Brutus is deep in thought; honorable man Antony offers Caeser the crown, crowd cheers; keeps offering, Caeser keeps denying mostly for show; third time he faints and has a seizure Casca in line with Cassius; according to Casca, Caeser does want the crown Why did Antony have the crown? Suspicious? Crush the serpent instead of letting it hatch- Caeser *Conspirators arrive; all swear an oath of secrecy Brutus says no, oaths…

Words 2000 - Pages 8

Selected Topics in Roman History Essay

Kingship seems not to have been hereditary Some kings to have been chosen by election, or consolation Others may have seized power as tyrants The Legend of the fall of the Monarchy King Tarquin the Proud overthrown by nobles led by Junius Brutus Tarquin, with Etruscan allies, attempted to retake the city by force stopped by the heroism of Horatius After this the republican system emerged The legend was a way of explaining a more gradual political change The Etruscans The argument…

Words 1591 - Pages 7