Argument Against Racial Profiling

Words: 693
Pages: 3

It is often hard to believe, but even today over fifty years after the end of segregation, racism still exists, although in a different form. This type of segregation, referred to as racial profiling, has evolved over time. It started when people believed that if someone looked or acted a certain way, they were going to be threatened. Racial profiling can be found all over the world, not only in inner cities, but also in smaller, more rural settings. When it comes to racial profiling, people tend to react quickly to their instincts, such as swiftly walking away or even taking it to larger extremes, such as getting law enforcement involved. I believe that a [A] certain race should not be profiled because of a few troubled people among that race. …show more content…
Therefore, the parents tell their child to watch out for suspicious people, and if they come in contact with some to call them right away. By parents telling their child this, it helps protect them but at the same time it makes the child frightened of people who may cause harm. Therefore, when the child goes out, they are extremely sensitive to anyone who looks out of place. With that said, why do parents instill these fears in their children? It is simply because the parents were threatened by one bad person, so they profile the one bad person’s entire race. If parents did not trigger these fears in their children or discriminate against certain races, racial profiling would cease in existence. John 7:24 supports this argument, “Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment” (Catholic Youth Bible, John 7.24). According to this verse, if we as humans constantly strive to live a Christian lifestyle, what gives us the right to