This parallels with the other case, which is a fight for the parents to keep her on life support under the hope that she improves, and has been on it for years. Those against keeping patients on life support, taking from a article on the misconceptions between death and brain death, say, “Brain death is death. It has nothing to do with being a coma. It does not refer to a permanent vegetative state. When it is pronounced using the standard tests and diagnostic procedures, a person is dead.” (Arthur Caplan Ph.D., Death, Brain Death, and Life Support). This is a common quote that the act of life support is just the preservation of a body without autonomy, as well as eventual deterioration of the body, and the end of life support should be a step in putting them to rest. Those for the act of keeping patients on life support say that there’s a chance of recovery and any chance of survival is worth extended stays. Some note that there is noticed growth on younger life-support patients, as well as some reaction (or at least movement) on them. The arguments mainly focus on the benefits and the futility of the procedure, and how the patient’s benefit is the main ethical focus in