Arguments Against Life Support

Words: 1508
Pages: 7
Open Document
Life support is equipment that is used by doctors to help maintain a person’s function of their vital organs. This is usually used for people in comas or a person who is critically ill. Life support does not better someone’s life. It just helps maintain it. The person is still breathing but is not mentally and physically there. Life support takes over the organs for a short period of time, but for dying people it can be harmful to their bodies which can make them suffer. In discussions of life, support one controversial issue has been if dying people should be kept on life support. My own view is that dying people should be left to die in peace with dignity. The person has suffered enough, and shouldn’t be put through more pain.
When the doctors see that all hope is lost in a patient, then they encourage the patient's family to end the patient's suffering and disconnect them. On life support the patient is only suffering unconscious and is not in control of their mind or body. Their organs are not functioning and will not get any better just worse with time. Just keeping them on life support is putting off the natural process of death and making it even more difficult for the families. These situations are hard for …show more content…
I believe that letting go is a selfless act that all families should contemplate how considerably better it is for the patient’s well-being. Some families are selfish and are not really discerning of the person and what he or she is going through. According to Deborah Cook “In the context of end-of-life decision-making, clinicians use technology to orchestrate the "best" death possible for critically ill patients under difficult circumstances. This goal is concerned less with health outcomes in the traditional sense than it is with the aesthetic, ethical and social experiences of those involved in the patient's care” (1). Cooks point is
Show More

Related Documents: Arguments Against Life Support

Benjamin Banneker Declaration Of Independence Rhetorical Analysis

Benjamin Banneker. Banneker wrote a letter to Thomas Jefferson, the framer of the Declaration of Independence arguing against slavery. In his letter he uses many rhetorical devices to support his argument against slavery. Some of the strategies included the use of metonymy, holy war, last resort, and bandwagon. All of these devices contributed to a stronger argument for Banneker to argue against Jefferson’s idea of slavery. The author uses a metonymy when he refers to the British King. “Sir, suffer me to…

Words 459 - Pages 2

Controversy: Suicide And Defense Of Human Life

these methods have certain arguments for and against and each has the potential to provoke controversy both for and against. I hope to be able to present both sides of the ethical dilemmas by presenting both he arguments for and against taking a human life under the listed circumstances. Suicide in itself is questionable whether or not it is moral or immoral. There are several arguments for and against committing suicide. One of the most prominent arguments against is religious beliefs, that…

Words 611 - Pages 3

Intellectual Disabilities Having Children: Documentary Analysis

There are many arguments on the issues of those with intellectually disabilities having children. One argument in support for this is that the constitution gives everyone the right to marry and raise children and that they should be afforded this right just as other are (Read, 2014). In addition to the constitution giving them this right they do have the ability to be good parents. The ability to raise children and be a good parent cannot be based solely on the concept of intellectual abilities.…

Words 837 - Pages 4

The Death Penalty In The Criminal Justice System

they course in our communities. When the death penalty will continue to be an issue that will be debated among citizens for many years to come. Those who are in favor agree the death penalty is a fair punishment for those who take another human life, however, there are those who disagree. This essay will cover a brief history of the death penalty and some point of view of why some are in favor of the death penalty and both to the idea. Intro/History: The death penalty (the killing of convicted…

Words 1228 - Pages 5

Essay on Doctor: Cord Stem Cells

Arguments against research Embryonic stem cell research has been in the controversial focus for many years and has gathered a lot of opposition to stem cell research from the public and religious groups. One of the other important arguments against stem cells research is that there has been virtually no real successful cure or even a potential for cure found to support destroying the beginning of life, there's no evidence that a destroyed human embryo will help someone. Stem cells for research…

Words 348 - Pages 2

Definition Of Against Work

article “Against Work”. Consequently, in this paper, there are plenty of definitions of the article “Against Work” will be described as follows. To begin with, the article “Against Work” was wrote by Christopher Clausen, according to the topic, it quite obvious that the content of the article is concerned with the idea of not working. Consequently, the author utilizes a number of examples, describing the reason,…

Words 1240 - Pages 5

Euthanasia Controversy

Euthanasia: The Controversy of Life or Death Life or death? Although the answer might seem obvious, it can be more difficult than it appears. Although the human body is resilient, there are some things that it cannot overcome. With certain illnesses and injuries, the body will shut down and go into a coma. With others, the patient will live but be in incredible pain. With no known solutions and little hope for recovery, the question of life or death becomes more complicated. Should the lives of…

Words 1196 - Pages 5

Fallacy and Samsung Galaxy s 3 Essay

Logic Weak/Fallacy : IPhone is a phone like Samsung galaxy s3. Galaxy s3 has android, therefore iPhone has android. Ambiguity (Equivocation): Using a term in multiple meanings are used in one argument. Ex: A feather is light. Light is not dark and so a feather is not dark. Red Herring: Distracts the arguer by introducing a new topic. Sweeping generalizations: Applying a general rule to a statement where some parts do not apply. Ex: Children should be seen and not heard. Since little Wolfgang…

Words 343 - Pages 2

Marquis Argument On Abortion

I agree with Marquis’ argument and believe that abortion is immoral. Like other human beings, fetuses have the right to live their lives and that right should never be taken from anyone, especially if they do not have a decision on what happens in their life. Even though a woman might get an abortion because she is not ready for a child at that moment, there is the possibility that the child could lead a successful life. Marquis’ stance on abortion is that it is morally wrong to do so because it…

Words 985 - Pages 4

Analysis of Arguments Against Id Essay

E142W Analysis of the Arguments against Intelligent Design Ayala argues that intelligent design is not a scientific theory. His first premise deals with the fact that scientific theories must be falsifiable, and his second premise deals with the false dichotomy of evolution and intelligent design. While his arguments are logically valid, an objection that could be made about his argument is his definition of intelligent design. One of the premises of Ayala’s argument is that for a theory to…

Words 972 - Pages 4