Assessing The Quality And Reliability Of Peer Reviewed And Grey Literature About HIV And AIDS

Submitted By kathkish
Words: 911
Pages: 4
Open Document
How to critique a paper
A search of the Web of Science database found that in 2008 there were 13,590 papers published in peer reviewed journals or at conferences on the topic “HIV”. Many smaller, independent pieces of research were also published that year in the form of reports or conference abstracts (grey literature). With so much research about HIV how do we assess which findings are relevant to our everyday work? When we read a paper or report, how do we judge whether we should immediately incorporate the study results into our work plans or wait for more evidence? This NAHIP toolkit describes how to critique a paper and provides a step-by-step guide to assessing the quality and reliability of peer reviewed and grey literature about HIV and AIDS.

1. Where was the article published?
Peer review is a well-accepted indicator of quality scholarship. Authors submit their papers to a journal to be reviewed by other researchers or practitioners (peers) in their field. Articles are only accepted by peer reviewed journals if they meet expected standards.
Journal popularity and/or importance can be judged by “impact factor”, that is a measure of how many times a journal’s articles are quoted over a three year period. The higher the impact factor the more selective the journal editors are about which manuscripts they accept. Generic medical publications (e.g. The Lancet) tend to have a higher impact factor; articles about HIV and AIDS that appear in these journals are thought to be of the highest scientific value. Box 1. shows journals that publish articles about sexual health and their respective impact factors.
Research published as grey literature is often specialised and only applicable to small populations. This does not mean the findings are not valuable or reliable, however an especially critical eye should be cast over the research as it has often not been judged by recognised experts in the field. 2. Who wrote the paper?
It might be helpful to establish whether the author is well known for his/her work. A good reputation is important and experienced, well known researchers are unlikely to put their name to research that might damage their professional standing. NAHIP Toolkit_part9.indd 1

Box 1. Sexual health-related peer reviewed jounals and their 2008 Impact Factor

Journal Name

2008
Impact
Factor

Ethnicity & Health

0.9

International Journal of STD & AIDS

1.1

AIDS Care-Psychological And SocioMedical aspects of AIDS / HIV

1.5

AIDS Education and Prevention

1.5

AIDS Patient Care and STDS

2.4

Social Science & Medicine

2.6

Sexually Transmitted Infections

2.6

AIDS & Behavior

2.7

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

2.9

HIV Medicine

3.1

Journal of Epidemiology and
Community Health

3.2

AIDS Reviews

3.3

JAIDS-Journal Of Acquired Immune
Deficiency Syndromes

4.6

Journal of Sexual Medicine

5.4

AIDS

5.5

International Journal Of
Epidemiology

5.8

British Medical Journal

12.8

The Lancet

28.4

Nature

31.4

New England Journal of Medicine

50.0

07/08/2009 18:41:29

3. What is the relevance to prevention?
Having read the paper, it is important to first understand its relevance to HIV prevention and ask what the study adds to the established knowledge base. Perhaps this study builds on the work of others by using more rigorous methods. Maybe it provides new insight into risk behaviour or highlights the effectiveness of a new prevention intervention. If it is hard to understand
the
Show More

Related Documents: Assessing The Quality And Reliability Of Peer Reviewed And Grey Literature About HIV And AIDS

Kant's Response To Hume

relationship? (2) What is Kant’s attitude toward skepticism, and how is it manifest in the arguments of the Critique of Pure Reason? (3) What is Kant’s argument…

Words 647 - Pages 3

Guidelines for Concept Paper: The Pursuit of Happiness

BEFORE Thanksgiving! Since this paper is optional, if you are doing it, it is because you want and/or need the practice (and points), so this will be doubly beneficial in preparing you for the Exit Exam—“two birds—one stone.” Please use the essay “A Critique of Positive Psychology” as the basis for your test questions. The following are “stem questions” from the actual exams. You MUST use this specific format to receive full credit—no exceptions! You will also submit an Answer Key with the correct…

Words 738 - Pages 3

The Pros And Cons Of Government Fracking

methane contents and thus, facilitate shale gas extractions very deep inside earth, which cannot be done effectively through other methods. Arguments: This study involves critique of two excellent articles on the subject of fracking- first, namely ‘The Guardian’ article by Adam Vaughan titled “Why is fracking bad? You asked Google- here’s the answer” and second, BBC Article titled “What is fracking and why is it controversial?”…

Words 425 - Pages 2

Marc Lynch

In “Why Engage?: China and the Logic of Communicative Engagement”, Marc Lynch, a professor of Political Science at George Washington University, receiving his BA from Duke University and his MA and PhD from Cornell, describes the best method of how the United States should handle the “paper tiger” of the South Pacific (Lynch Biography). Currently, the United States holds a ‘containment strategy’ as its foreign policy towards the rising power, much like its dogma towards the Soviet Union during the…

Words 1430 - Pages 6

Psychology Test Paper

Journal articles are one of the ways in which psychologists in the field communicate with one another about their research findings. It is important to be able to identify the main findings, decipher the research methods, and understand the implications of the research. Additionally, it is important to be able to recognize the differences, strengths, and weaknesses between correlational and experimental research. Your Assignment: You will select two research articles from peer-reviewed journals…

Words 937 - Pages 4

A: Marketing and Article Essay

a)Article Number : 1 xInhua. March 9th,2014. Tencent and Jingdong close to shareholding deal. Retrieved from March 10, 2014. From http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=2014030900Tencent and Jingdong close to shareholding deal0117&cid=1206 b)Why the article was chosen? This article was chosen because its title attract in business news, not only it talked about the online market in china, but also it shows the changes in the trend in 2013. c) Concept and 2 1.e-commerce 2. shareholder…

Words 1614 - Pages 7

Difference Between Evidence Based Practice Articles

Articles can be difficult to identify, critique, and synthesize. Critically appraising articles is an art practicing nurses must master to broaden their knowledge for practice. Therefore, nurses must apply scientific evidence as they continue to strive for continuity of patient care. Articles appearing in medical journals, academic peer-reviews, or scientific journals could be classified as quality improvement, evidence-based practice, or research articles. Differentiating between these articles…

Words 328 - Pages 2

Essay about HLC122 LEO Lectures Wk1 Concepts Of Clinical Reasoning Critical Thinking And EBP

on and making meaning of a range of complex information in the health care environment...” (ACU, 2010, p. 1). • What is ‘making meaning’? – Understanding complex information – Being able to critique complex information • To do this: – You need to understand how knowledge is developed. – You need to be able to critique that knowledge. 3 1 18/02/2015 What is critical thinking? • There are many definitions. • critical thinking in Taber's Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary – “...1. The ability to interpret argument…

Words 1080 - Pages 5

Kenneth Burke's Rhetorical Criticism

Kenneth Burke, a twentieth-century rhetorical critic, focuses attention towards motivation for messages; emphasizing the “why” behind what people say. Meaning, Burke rejects, “…the commonly held notion that communication is primarily a process of message transmission” insisting the motives for speech as a rhetorical act-dramatism. (293) In fact, Burke defines dramatism as, “A technique of analysis of language and thought as basically modes of action rather than as means of conveying information”…

Words 333 - Pages 2

Essay on Research Critique 2

Research Critique The aim of this assignment is to critical analyse and evaluate a primary piece of evidence within the author’s clinical practice. Prior to analysing the literature the author will give a brief description of the term clean intermittent self-catheterisation, identify various conditions where this procedure may be undertaken and the assessment process which is necessary for patients before they can carry out this procedure. Due to word limitations the term Clean intermittent self-catheterisation…

Words 691 - Pages 3