Basic Principles Of The Tort Of Negligence

Submitted By Linsen510
Words: 580
Pages: 3
Open Document
Basic principles of the Tort of Negligence

1. What are the differences between Contract and Tort?

1) Requirement for the contact: offer acceptance and consideration between the parties to form a legally binding agreement. (whereas in tort, there is no agreement between the parties) The parties are known to each other, and they are consensus parties. The compensation for breach of contract is to put the eviction in a position as if the obligations were fulfilled. 2) Tort is a wrongful act or omission for which damages can be obtained in a civil court by the person wronged. Wrongful act or omission which caused personal injury or property damage. The wrongful act or omission can be intentional or negligent. There is no agreement between the parties for an action in tort.

2. What are the 3 elements for a negligent action?

1) The defendant owes a duty of care to the plaintiff.

Means-a person has a legal obligation to take care when he can foresee a loss occurring if he acts carelessly. The duty of care is owed to one’s neighbour (neighbour principle in Donohue --v- Stevenson case) – ie those person that are or should be in the contemplation of the defendant as likely to be affected by the defendant’s act or omissions.

2) The defendant was in breach of the duty of care.

In determining whether the defendant has breached the duty of care, there are 2 stage processes, ie: a. The court has to establish the standard of care that an average reasonable person or a person professing special skills should have taken in the circumstances. This test is objective, ie it dose not take into account what the defendant might have considered to be reasonable in the situation. b. The Court then determines whether the defendant has met the standard established above.

3) The plaintiff suffered damages flowing from the breach.

The loss that the plaintiff has suffered must be caused by the defendant’s breach of duty of care. It must not be too remote.

3. Case Study Questions: a. What is Best Shoes Ltd’ cause of action against Jack for the damaged shoes?

Best shoes- plaintiff- person who commence the legal
Show More

Related Documents: Basic Principles Of The Tort Of Negligence

Amazing Stories Essay

Industry Insiders Course: FTV 310/510 Spring 2014 Yingguang Peng 1881115 Sid Caesar was just great in this show. He plays "Lou Bundles," a veteran magician, a guy who has performed at this same nightclub for 50 years! Lou Bundles was once a very famous illusionist. He is still performing, but often his tricks don't work any more. He can't accept that he is getting too old for the job. Just after he talks the boss into not firing him, Lou takes a trip into an old magic shop and buys a deck of old…

Words 490 - Pages 2

NESCOR And Antunas: A Case Study

Since the contract contained the required FTC language, TMS couldn't be a holder in due course (Samuelson, 510). Therefore, even though TMS was not acting bad in faith, TMS cannot be a holder in due course. In addition, TMS could have confirmed that the NESCOR sales person was registered or not. To be a holder in due course, a person must be in good faith (Samuelson, 507). Since connecticut law doesn't allow a…

Words 346 - Pages 2

Checks And Balances: The Roman Republic

most significant. It began after the overthrow of the Roman monarchy in 510 BC and ended in 27 BC with the establishment of the Roman Empire. Consuls were the head of the government who were elected annually by the citizens. Consuls oversaw the workings of the government and its officials, as well as being the commander of the army. The Senate was the most permanent governing and advisory council and were essentially, the law makers of Rome. They decided on the spending, controlled taxation and relations…

Words 163 - Pages 1

Commonwealth V Schley Case Summary

that the complaining witness had, on multiple occasions been committed to a mental institution. The first supposed error is derived from Commonwealth v. Schley No.124 WDA 2015, for which the Superior Court came to the conclusion that the Rape Shield Law is not applicable to prior false sexual assault allegations. The Superior Court also declared the RSL to not considered false allegations a sexual conduct; however, this information needs to be presented as a motion in limine. Commonwealth v. Schley…

Words 987 - Pages 4

Armistice Day Research Paper

On November 11th, 1918, the Germans and the Allies signed a treaty in the Forest of Compiegne in France ending World War I. Armistice Day, as it was known then, ended four years of bloody conflict. People throughout the world blew whistles, held impromptu parades, closed places of business and paid tribute to their fallen soldiers. Armistice Day was observed in 1919 and beyond with veterans' parades, religious and secular services and two minutes of silence to honor the dead. In 1920, the…

Words 288 - Pages 2

The Religious Conflict Between Antigone And Creon

fundamentally the primary case of the conflict between the two characters. The religion conflict between the perspective of Antigone and Creon highlight a friction between the laws of gods and the laws of man. The characterization of the character Antigone fashions her to be religious and solely determined to uphold the laws of gods. The decisions made…

Words 596 - Pages 3

Week 6 Assignment 2: the Hiring Process and Managing a Diverse Workforce Essay

us/question_des/Week6Assignment2TheHiringProcessandManagingaDiverseWorkforce/2781 Contact us at: help@mindblows.us HRM 510 Week 6 Assignment 2: The Hiring Process and Managing a Diverse Workforce Due Week 6 and worth 400 points Imagine that you are the HR Director at your current organization or an organization with which you are familiar. As the HR Director, you must use different employment law requirements to create methods and policies that support the promotion of a diverse workforce. Select one (1)…

Words 1112 - Pages 5

City of God Essay

| | |The City of God: Saint Augustine Style | |By: | |Word Count: 2000…

Words 2010 - Pages 9

Plaintiff Vs Oliva Case Study

46. Plaintiff has filed EEOC/ DFEH charge number 480-2017-02287N, and received Notices of Right to Sue in those charge numbers, and he has alleged, in part, that the Defendant’s termination of him violated 42 U.S.C. §2000e, 42 U.S.C. §1981, Cali. Laws Civ. §§51, et seq. and Gov. Code §12940 et seq. (See Exhibit A – EEOC Notice to Right to Sue) Plaintiff is informed and believes that DOE Defendants 1 through 50 are California residents and/or parents, subsidiaries, and/or sister corporations to…

Words 557 - Pages 3

The Greeks Essay

the citizens, voting in an assembly Two Types of Democracy Direct Democracy (Greece): A government in which people vote to make their own rules and laws Representative Democracy (Rome): A government in which people vote for representatives. The representatives make rules and laws that govern themselves and the people.? Around 510 BCE - The Ancient Athenians Invented Democracy Over 2400 years ago, the famous and arguably greatest Greek general and leader Pericles, said, "It is true…

Words 733 - Pages 3