v. Hobby Lobby this requirement was challenged (oyez.org 2). Usually the Department of Health and Human Services would be fine with a non-profit corporation not having to cover the cost of contraceptives, but it’s a different story with large for-profit corporations (American
Constitutional Law pg. 346). The main issues involved in this case were religious beliefs and women’s rights. Hobby Lobby is a Christian-based chain store company owned by the Green family who are Christians (oyez.org 1). The Green family deeply agrees with the Christian principle that the use …show more content…
The plaintiffs argued that the requirement violated the Religious Freedom
Restoration Act of 1993 and the Free Exercise Clause of the 1st Amendment (oyez.org 2). The
Department of Health and Human Services felt that the Green family threw away all their rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act when they started a for-profit business (American
Constitutional Law pg. 346). This case sort of balances the rights of individuals with the needs of society because the Green family did not have to disobey their religious beliefs, but a percentage of women were refused their rights. This certain case occurred because the Green family felt their rights were being violated, so they decided to take a stand and do something about it. In return, the Department of Health and Human Services decided to fight back because they felt if the Green family were making a profit for themselves, then they should pay for their employees
(American Constitutional Law pg. 347). I am not sure if I fully agree with the court’s decision to
Worsley 3 rule in favor of the Green family. I believe that people shouldn’t have to do something if it