Case Study: Officer Robert Barton Paper
How the concepts relate to groups and group dynamics describe what kind of person Officer Barton is and wants to be. He seems that he was raised in a smaller community were the values, attitudes and perspectives were quite different from what he is now exposed to in a metropolitan city. Officer Barton values are different, he is the kind of person that was taught different values that were influenced by his upbringing. Officer Barton is the sort of person that is a strong individual that stands strong for things that he believes in that is right. With this Office Barton drive in wanting to be a good officer was a fired up by conforming to the department to receive acceptance by fellow officers. With this he had to conform to a new class of an organization, this gives him grounds for having to forgo the new cultural acceptance that he is now faced with. Armed with this information he wants to accomplish his goal as an officer, so he had to make choice and conform to the agency beliefs and to be accepted by fellow officers in order for him achieve success of an officer. This left him faced with a dilemma, knowing the mentality of the agency that the officers had their own subculture at work, with this they expect officers to act a certain way. Even though Officer Barton does not like the was the agency developed, he knows that for him to fit in and succeed that he would have to follow the directions and be accepted into the subculture of the agency in order for him to succeed as a police officer.
So let us look at group cohesion and how it ceases to be positive. Group cohesion ceases to positive when there seems to be a clash of personalities within the group. Also, when there is a disagreement between colleagues in the group that concerns social rules, tasks and a termination in communication between the members of the group or with a member and a group leader. What causes group cohesiveness to cease to be positive can be attributed to several aspects such as intermittent turnover of members of the group, one or more members that struggle to gain control, and lastly is when the group has a disagreement on their objectives and goals. So when does group cohesiveness converts in to pathological? Is starts when members of the group are in fear of being alienated and losing rank, this
leads to preventing members from speaking out creatively. This could raise the possibility that within the group about unwelcome ideas or the possibility of a negative occurrence this results from the groups intended actions. So how does pathological fit into group thinking, it is one of the principal components to the group. It transpires for the members that strive on behalf of acceptance and complete agreement within their group. When and if this happens, it could cause the group to become massive, that it would stop them from thinking freely and their motivation. This could also lead to members to reasonably evaluate other action to take.
It seems in most professional careers there is some form of a subculture. And the police are no different. The police subculture is known for certain characteristics that makes them sometime feel untouchable but, they are commended for