In the Central Park Five case, the concept of the ideal victim plays a crucial role in shaping both the handling of the case and the reporting surrounding it. As we learned in class, Nils Christie’s definition of the ideal victim is blameless, worthy of sympathy, and possesses certain characteristics that make them more deserving of sympathy and support in the aftermath of a crime (Christie, 1986: 18-19). In this case, the jogger, Trisha Meili, fits the mold of Christie’s ideal victim quite well. She is perceived as a blameless, innocent, and sympathetic victim due to her status as an …show more content…
As a wealthy and influential figure, Trump’s opinions carried weight and helped to polarize public opinion. His call to action on the reinstatement of the death penalty had resonated with many New Yorkers, who were concerned about the rising crime rates and leniency perceived with the current justice system. Trump’s letter reflects on the broader implications and issues of racial bias within the criminal justice system. His explicit support of the death penalty, despite the lack of evidence against these teenagers, is appalling and abhorrent and underscores the dangers of rushing to conclusions without due process and fairness. It also serves as a stark reminder of the influence and role that powerful individuals play and how political rhetoric can help shape public perception and justice in the court system. In a 2019 interview, Trump stated that he would not apologize for his harsh comments surrounding the Central Park case, stating “They admitted their guilt” (Ransom,