The Chinese exclusion act was a movement that prohibited Chinese immigration; people used it as a discrimination against Chinese people. In one year Chinese immigration dropped from 40,000 to 23. This shows how people where violent and discriminant to Chinese fellows. In 1879 an anti-Chinese play was created by Henry Grimm; the point of the document was the problem of Chinese people taking over American jobs, this was written in San Francisco, CA. In 1879 there was an anti-Chinese sentiment, the railroad was completed, and a high number act of violence against the Chinese. The document targets the government figures and the America public. This document has a bias towards an argument against Chinese and the …show more content…
He states that Chinese were hated because they were envious of them. This manuscript was intended for American people to show the truth. It achieved to reveal the truth and explain the purpose of all the chaos. The author has a great point of view that reveals true facts; it makes me realize how cruel the people where at that time. The document tell the viewers how other immigrants where highly bitter by the fact that Chinese immigrant workers where better than them. This is important because it shapes how people where people where at those times; not liking a race just because they are better workers than them. This contradicts the act, from true facts of the document: “labor was never cheap”, this means that scarce work was never the problem but the actual immigrant people that were not as great workers. According to Chew’s journal titled “the biography of a chinaman” exposes the truth by showing facts on how Chinese people were mistreated, giving us reasons on why it all happened. Although there is much evidence that Chinese man were treated disrespectful, an analysis of the document reveals the true reasons why Chinese where treated in such a way. Jealousy was the whole problem.
The Chinese exclusion act was an unfair law that affected several Chinese, their only purpose was to work and have a better life. Some of the documents were weak, they didn’t support much evidence. On the other hand some articles were good, for