Citizens United Vs Fec Case Study

Words: 964

Pages: 4

Open Document

Citizens United v. FEC is a United States 2010 constitutional law case which is concerned with the limits which the First Amendment imposes on the government to regulate political spending by nonprofit corporations. It was found by the Supreme Court that legislation which prohibits political expenditures by corporations is unconstitutional, in violation with the First Amendment. The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, which Justice Kennedy argued includes not only individuals, but also associations of individuals (Citizens United 2010). This would logically include corporations. This court case has large ramifications for the electoral process at the state and federal level, substantially in which candidates run for election by gaining backing from …show more content…
Their movie, Hillary: The Movie, would be in violation of some provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, which was intended to regulate the influence of “big money” on “electioneering communications” (Lindbloom & Terranova 2010). As a consequence, the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission was brought forward to challenge this prohibition on “electioneering communications” by independent, privately-funded nonprofit corporations. Implicated in the decision would be not only how and whether political expenditures by nonprofit corporations would be regulated, but how political expenditure by any similar, privately funded association, such as a for-profit or labor union would be regulated (McElroy 2010). Indeed, the impact could be so extensive that it could pave the way for political expenditures made, in effect, by foreign corporations (Gerstein

Citizens United Vs Fec Case Study

The citizens united v. FEC is a supreme court case on January 21st 2010. The case argued that BRCA was limiting our first amendment right for freedom of speech due to the fact they are stopping corporations and unions from supporting politicians . This decision let unions and corporations use general funds to support candidates running for office. Some believe that this ruling allows politicians and government officials to be bought while others think the politicians taking these funds will work…

Words 625 - Pages 3

Citizens United Vs Fec Case Study

contribute to political candidates, parties, or political action committees, and what disclosures they need to make about their political spending. “The Supreme Court spoke clearly this term on the issue of corporate political speech, concluding in Citizens United v. FEC' that the First Amendment protects corporations' freedom to spend corporate funds on indirect support of political candidates” (Bebchuk). The ethical question here revolves around whether it’s right for businesses to engage in political activities…

Words 935 - Pages 4

Citizens United Vs Fec Case Study

Citizens United v. FEC was a controversial case involving money within politics. It was the case that determined whether or not large corporations could spend money to support specific candidates and political parties. This was a very controversial case because many believe that putting a limit on spending would violate the First Amendment. Still, others believe that corporations should not be able to spend money, as it takes away from the majority group and the working class. People will likely…

Words 1313 - Pages 6

Essay on AP Government and Politics

AP Government and Politics Study Guide Amendments 1st Amendment Civil Liberties: Religion, Speech, Assembly & Petition Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press, or the right of the people to peacefully to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Establishment Clause: “make no law respecting the establishment of …” Free Exercise Clause: “or prohibiting…

Words 3262 - Pages 14