Citizens United Vs Fec Case Study

Words: 1313
Pages: 6

Citizens United v. FEC was a controversial case involving money within politics. It was the case that determined whether or not large corporations could spend money to support specific candidates and political parties. This was a very controversial case because many believe that putting a limit on spending would violate the First Amendment. Still, others believe that corporations should not be able to spend money, as it takes away from the majority group and the working class. People will likely base their opinions in this case on how they personally interpret the First Amendment. Even though there are many pros and cons within this case, the Supreme Court did rule correctly in this case because of the First Amendment, the advertisement of …show more content…
They say, “The fact that a corporation, or any other speaker, is willing to spend money to try to persuade voters presupposes that the people have the ultimate influence over elected officials” (Citizens United v. F.E.C., 2010). If the people decide to change their decision because of a certain corporation, then that is on the people. There are many different factors in our country that may sway someone’s opinion. Even though corporations may have a larger influence on the people than others, it is still the people who decide who to vote for. Even if a corporation happens to sway opinions within Congress, it still remains a decision for those Congressmen. The influence that corporations have lies within the people and the final decisions that they make regarding governmental and political issues. Corporations don’t magically get a significant amount of votes more than regular citizens. The only way that they have the ability to influence an election is by swaying an individual’s political beliefs and ideas. There isn’t nearly as much influence as people think. Those who believe that they have a large influence believe that Congress makes its decisions solely based on these large