Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

Words: 665

Pages: 3

Open Document

Civil Disobedience is an essay that caused great controversy in the past and the present, mainly because of its appeal against government system. The essay was written by Henry David Thoreau, a transcendentalist surveyor who opposed government through the use of pasivist methods. He wrote the essay during the 1800s, a period of great discontent for society, he was known for criticizing everything around him and characterized by his pessimism and hopelessness towards mankind. Much alike biblical beliefs, which are composed on the concept of a fallen nature within man, Civil Disobedience meditates on the idea that corruption and imperfection are impregnated in the behavior of men. Therefore implying that man cannot accomplish perfection alone. Understanding the bIblical background of the essay brings forth many ideas not seen before such as Thoreau’s proposal that the only way people can achieve success and perfection is through a greater being such as God, for he is the standard of perfection. …show more content…
The convictions that Thoreau wheedle people to think about correlates to the ones which the Bible mandates its followers to do. The writer states that humans have a moral standard and an obligation towards protecting it and opposing those who do harm against it. Thereby stating that by not opposing the injustices that take place in our lives, it automatically converts us into accomplices of it. By analysing the argument into pieces, several themes come out. For example Thoreau’s essay possesses the belief that humans have a moral standard, which indicates that he also thinks that someone must had implanted it into our very nature before we were even born, but

Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

One of Henry David Thoreau’s main points in “Civil Disobedience” is that a person is not obligated to devote their lives to eliminating evils from the world, but they are indeed obligated to not participating in evils. Socrates would definitely agree with this statement as indicated by how he acted in his life. Whilst serving as a soldier, Socrates remained in his post even under circumstances of grave danger. He only disobeyed his higher orders when the demands were unjust or unconstitutional and…

Words 267 - Pages 2

Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

Henry David Thoreau illustrates “Civil Disobedience” as an equivalent and moral man amongst his beloved brothers and sisters on behalf of addressing his government's largest issues. The excerpt alone, however, speaks genuinely and entirely as a true American. In just about every aspect of his speech; with reference to all political, social, and monetary order, Thoreau addresses his opinions and beliefs through his first hand experience, man's utmost basic civil rights as well as internal will to…

Words 340 - Pages 2

Rhetorical Analysis On Civil Disobedience

When one thinks about civil disobedience they tend to think negatively about it because all laws are made and placed here for a reason, but after one reads Henry David Thoreau’s essay on Civil Disobedience it really makes one think about how unfair some of our laws really are. In Thoreau’s essay he says that he believes, “That government is best which governs least.” Thoreau believes that the government is something unnecessary, impractical, and inconvenient. I believe that government and law was…

Words 665 - Pages 3

Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience is full of different stylistic features that enable the reader to vividly interpret his ideas. Many of the paragraphs hold a variety of stylistic devices and contribute to an essential role in the development of the emotional aspect of the piece. Some stylistic devices like metaphors, repetition, and parallelism are used to convince and motivate the audience to rebel against the government’s injustice. Henry David Thoreau uses certain stylistic features in paragraph 19…

Words 496 - Pages 2

Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

The author of Civil Disobedience believes the nation does not need a stronger or less involved government, but a more proactive one that takes charge by using the citizens characters and ideas to better everyone. He/she developed his/her point of view by using stylistic devices (like personification, repetition, and tone) that would lead the reader to understand his claim. In the first paragraph the writer describes the army being an arm of the government, which the people use as a mode to their…

Words 288 - Pages 2

Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

As an incredible writer Thoreau voices his opinion on many different things. He agrees and disagrees with many things the government does. He has shared his experience of standing for what he believes in , in his essay “ Civil Disobedience.” There are are a few suggestions that Thoreau has for his readers. Thoreau suggest that they should should do what they believe is right and not to follow the law dictated by the majority , refuse to follow the law when it is unjust , and shows them that a person…

Words 578 - Pages 3

On Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

public demonstration because it shows you want the respect your giving to the law. When people protest in large, public groups, the rest of the country can see just how many people support a specific situation. In the document called, “On Civil Disobedience” written by Henry David Thoreau, he speaks to the people living in the USA, and states, “I heartily accept the motto, ‘That government is best which governs least’”(pg 1) . Thoreau means that men will someday be able to have a government that…

Words 204 - Pages 1

Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

Henry David Thoreau’s essay on civil disobedience has been around for about 168 years, yet its words contain an influence that has shaped men, groups, and even history. It is hard to deny the impact Civil Disobedience has had on history; it inspired Gandhi to practice Satyagraha and Martin Luther King to stand up against injustice. Thoreau’s characteristics and arguments for civil disobedience are a foundation in creating change, and his values are found in successful revolutionaries, both past and…

Words 591 - Pages 3

Thoreau Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

In “Civil Disobedience”, Thoreau criticizes not only a useless government but also incompetent citizens who sit idly by while the government does as it pleases. Thoreau’s direct piece calls for inherent human action to comply with the intelligence of man to stand against an unfitting government. Thoreau’s analysis of government and the way its run sets the stage for his argument. He criticizes the dwindling integrity of “the government itself, which is only the mode which the people have chosen…

Words 628 - Pages 3

On The Duty Of Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

Henry David Thoreau writes “On the duty of Civil Disobedience” and used creative writing when he portrays poetry to explain a deeper meaning. Thoreau explains how the 1849 American government was corrupted. Dr. Martin Luther king Jr writes the “Letter from a Birmingham jail” to the clergymen about how he aimed to change the public policy. Martin Luther king wants to change the public policy because the “whites” were treating the “colored” people wrong. Martin Luther king and Henry David Thoreau…

Words 419 - Pages 2