At the beginning of the school year, the teacher will ask the students to think about themselves as a person in school, a person in their family, and a person in their friend group. They will address their strengths and their weaknesses in each area and are not required to share out with the group of any personal information, but the teacher asks each student to be truthful to themselves and to the teacher. The teacher will then in one way or another (in person, digitally on Google drive, or through a journal) assess the students individually on how they may have commonalities in their strengths and weakness. It is expected that after reflection on who they are, the students can personally come up with solutions to grow from their weaknesses. Then, once the teacher has found the commonalities, the students and teacher can come together to find a plan of action that they can all agree …show more content…
Bandura was easy to pick as an important theorist due to the fact that I agree with teachers guiding students as modeling to be a positive example for their students. I had considered Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development as well as Piaget but I felt that their theories relied too much on the concept of stages that a student can be in and should be in during a certain time. I do not think that stages are what makes a student better and regarding Maslow I believe that a student can digress when it comes to moving up and down the pyramid. Students are lifelong learners and should not have an end to their