Jay Cheshire, a seventeen year old, was a victim of a false conviction of rape. On October 1, 2009, Cheshire was convicted of rape then further diagnosed with clinical depression after the conviction. He was to undergo professional therapy; however, two weeks after the conviction he committed suicide (Mail Online). Although he was to undergo therapy, the financial issues his mother and him encountered make it difficult to receive professional …show more content…
Mandery evaluated a case study which consisted of 118 falsely convicted rapists and with analyzing the results she came to the conclusion with the challenges an exoneree faces after incarceration can be “fixed” with a substantial compensation. He states “people exiting prison need, but often do not have, physical and mental health care, education, food, housing, jobs, and a support network (2013, p. 350).” In order for an exoneree to regain the support lost after incarceration, he or she needs to be compensated with the damages depending upon his or her sentence. Mandery says the falsely convicted rapist may seek compensation through: tort claims, private bills, or compensation statutes. However, the “best” way to gain compensation is through preexisting statutes (2013, p 365).” Although one may sue for compensation through preexisting statutes, the drawbacks remain. Gaining compensation through statutes is difficult since only twenty seven states have enacted statutes to compensate the wrongly convicted (Trinh). For example, California has a cap of 2 million dollars no matter the how long the sentence was (Trinh). Also, the amount of money given from the government is dependent on what they feel as “recoverable.” Although certain states have limitations on the money granted, there are different