Wrongful Convictions In Court Cases

Words: 1565
Pages: 7

Society is affected when a court convicts somebody who did not commit a crime. Courts convicting the right person who committed the crime is only sometimes consistently done. Despite the diligent work of the courts, innocent people can sometimes be mistakenly found guilty. This type of error has significant consequences that reach far and wide. It is essential to recognize that wrongful convictions occur more frequently than people often believe. Improper convictions, characterized as the conviction of innocent people, are more standard than frequently accepted. This exploration reveals that these terrible instances are not detached occurrences, but foundational issues burdening overall sets of laws worldwide. Factors contributing to wrongful convictions include eyewitness misidentification, false confessions, inaccurate …show more content…
The stories of these cases and of the individuals affected, like Captain Alfred Dreyfuss, the Scottsboro boys, those individuals who have been vindicated and exonerated by the Innocent Project, provide important reminders of the human cost of the illegal convictions and the importance of there being a need for a fair and impartial legal system. By eliminating the sources of the unjust punishment from these famous cases, and attacking the source from within, society can ensure that justice is undeniably served for all. Socio-Legal Implications of Wrongful Convictions Wrongful convictions affect more than just the guilty. They also affect those closest to the convicts. This could be friends, family, or other relatives. It is difficult to measure the extent of the effects of wrongful convictions. The emotional impact of losing part of an accused’s life, the psychological effects of prison life, and the stigmatization of incarcerated individuals go well beyond prison walls (Gross & O’Brien,