Wrongful Convictions In Criminal Justice

Words: 637
Pages: 3

A wrongful conviction has become known as factual innocence. A wrongful conviction might refer to a case in which a person with a good defense is found guilty. It may also be applied to a case in which the appellate court reverses the conviction because the defendant’s constitutional rights were violated (regardless of any factual guilt that might be present) (Zalman, M., Smith, B., & Kiger, A., 2008, p. 75). A wrongful conviction is a terrible injustice that is magnified when an actually innocent person spends years in prison or on death row.
Wrongful convictions are not a rare occurance. If they were they could be downplayed as a simple error as a result of a complex system. Due to frequency, this leads to the presumptions that these failing are linked to a systematic problem. As a result, the accuracy and fairness of the criminal justice system are challenged
…show more content…
It was involved in 75% of the 312 DNA exonerations (Wise, Sartori, Magnussen, & Safer 2013). Moreover, the American Psycholocial Association estimates that about one of every three witnesses makes an erroneous identification (Perry v. New Hampshire, 2012). Unlike a video recorder, the human memory does not have the capability to record all information that it comes across. As observed in a lecture by Professor Edwards this semester, the human memory loses a lot of informations from the short-term memory. As a result, the recall of facial recognition by a witness may be uncertain. In addition, events that cause stress (focus on a weapon), can decrease a victim and/or witnesses facial recal. Memory is dynamic and malleable. It can change during the recall stage from what was observed under the influence of suggestion (Wise et al., 2013). These and other factors show that eyewitness identification should be received with caution, and yet police, prosecutors, and especially jurors tend to rarely disbelieve eyewitness