Carnwell (1997) describes a critical appraisal as an unbiased and balanced
scrutiny of the research paper so that both its strengths and weaknesses are
highlighted. The focus of the appraisal with be on “Promoting the health of
people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; patients and their carer’s
views” (Caress et al, 2010). The format of the appraisal will be formed around a
set of criteria (see appendix 1).
The journal looks at the views of patients and their carer’s experiences with living
the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), its causes, how they manage
with the symptoms, its progression and what role …show more content…
However no time frame was given. Family
members of agreeing participants were then contacted by telephone, but only
after consent was obtained. The participants were then all given information
detailing their involvement. Non-malficence implies an intention of not harming
and preventing harm occurring to participants both of a physical and
psychological nature (Parahoo, 2006). Perhaps it would have been beneficial for
the researchers to set up a small support group after the research had been
conducted to ensure there were no issues with the participants. Beneficence is
establishing the research is of a useful nature and if it will help society in general
(Coughlan et al, 2007). Caress et al (2010) have established that COPD is a
worldwide cause of mortality and morbidity which is putting significant pressure
on the economy. Therefore it is safe to say that by carrying research in
maximising the health in COPD patients is going to be very beneficial to the
patients and society as by promoting better health puts less stress on the
National Health Service thus saving money. The researchers have also
acknowledged the contribution of the professor in respiratory medicine for his
development on the project. Polit and Beck (2010) suggest that a “Risk
assessment” should be carried out as