There is no objective way to justify punishment; each person has their own subjective view on how it can be justified. It comes down to the two main branches of moral philosophy – meta-ethics and normative ethics.
Meta-ethics focus on the foundations and methodology of morals. Some examples of meta-ethical theories include cultural relativism; this holds the idea that “right” is what is accepted by the majority of a given culture; moral subjectivism; this holds the idea that if we personally like something, it is good, and it teaches us to follow our feelings regardless of rationale; moral hedonism; this tells us to base our judgement on the pleasure it would create (similar to subjectivism); and lastly, moral rationalism; this teaches us that all judgements should be based purely and solely on reason.
On the other hand, normative ethics focus on the societal norms of right and wrong. The two major theories of this are teleological, and deontological. Teleological …show more content…
This theory was strongly supported by John Stuart Mill, another English philosopher from the same century. The prime principle behind utilitarianism is that the goodness or badness of a particular action is justified by the consequences of said action and how everyone else is affected by it. Regarding the utilitarian principle, John Stuart Mill stated ‘Utility … holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness’ (J.S. Mill, Utilitarianism, 1863: 9). The principle goal of utilitarianism is to maximise total happiness of everyone involved, which is corresponding with the meta-ethical theory moral hedonism, as it is based upon the pleasure that is created from an action. This is a normative idea, considering the fact that it is stating we should act upon this