Essay on Moral Skepticism Response

Submitted By Courtney-Harlan
Words: 1319
Pages: 6
Open Document
Ethical Relativism What constitutes right and wrong behavior is a highly debated concept, which differs among diverse cultures, societies, traditions, and beliefs when determining specific rules about those actions. Ethical relativism is the theory that some moral standards are true, but their truth is relative to societies/cultures or each individual person and thus those standards will only apply within a culture or to an individual. The theory is subject to a number of objections, two of which concern moral progress and moral equivalence. Despite these objections, the ethical relativist still attempts to defend this theory by responding with the concept of the ideal observer. In this paper I will discuss the theory of ethical relativism, outline the two aforementioned objections to the theory, and show how the relativist tries to respond to these objections. According to ethical relativism, there are no objective moral truths. Objective truths are those in which the truth is located in the object itself and is true regardless of what any individual believes (Haramia). These truths apply to everyone and provide a standard; such truths include the fact that John F. Kennedy was assassinated in 1963 and the modern English alphabet has twenty-six letters. These are good examples of objective truths because these truths will still be true even if someone denies them, do not know they are true, or do not believe them to be true. Ethical relativism, on the other hand, asserts that there are some moral claims that are true, but are only true relative to the beliefs of a given individual or society and because certain people at a certain place and a certain time believe things in a certain way.
The theory can be further dissected to reveal two types of ethical relativism: ethical subjectivism and cultural relativism. “Ethical subjectivism claims that moral standards are true relative only to the beliefs of each individual person (Chafer-Landau, 293).” According to this claim, an act would be morally acceptable simply because an individual approves of that act or the values he stands for allow for it. An act would be wrong only when the individual disapproves of it or his values do not allow for it. As a result of this, each individual’s moral standards are equally plausible. Conversely, cultural relativism claims that the correct moral standards are relative to each of the various cultures or societies. According to cultural relativism, an act is morally acceptable because it is allowed by the traditions/ideals of the society and immoral because it is forbidden by those same ideals (Chafer-Landau, 293).
Ethical subjectivism and cultural relativism differ in that ethical subjectivism claims moral standards apply only to the individual given that the individual endorses that standard, whereas cultural relativism claims that moral standards apply only to a culture given that the culture endorses that standard. Though ethical subjectivism asserts that moral claims are true relative to each individual and cultural relativism asserts that moral claims are true relative to each culture, both ethical subjectivism and cultural relativism assert that the correct moral standards are relative, not objective truths.
Ethical relativism is met with a number of objections. Two of these concern moral equivalence and moral progress. Moral equivalence means that each individual or society’s moral views have equal claim to the truth. According to ethical relativism, moral truth depends on each individual or society, making each individual or society right. Thus, this theory leads to moral equivalence because each individual or society must be right if their moral claims are true, since the only rule for their claims to be true is that they sincerely believe them. From this view, the relativist would have to conclude that Hitler’s beliefs are just as plausible as the beliefs of Mother Theresa because they both sincerely held certain beliefs, thus
Show More

Related Documents: Essay on Moral Skepticism Response

Dionysus In Euripides 'Play The Bacchae'

As the God of Wine and Revelry, Dionysus’ character in Euripides play, “The Bacchae”, is one that is almost ubiquitously appreciated and understood by man, as it represents a relatable sense of raw human nature and desire. The plot of the play concerns the efforts of King Pentheus of Thebes to crush his cousin Dionysus’ worship, but Pentheus’ refusal to acknowledge Dionysus’ power ultimately costs him his life. Although Pentheus is briefly successful in capturing the Stranger, a mysterious earthquake…

Words 1633 - Pages 7

Euthyphro's Response To Socrates

corresponding to matters of Athenian or Greek religious beliefs at the time. However, the wondrous learning, as drawn out of Euthyphro by Socrates, is that unlike his counterpart [Euthyphro], Socrates was enforcing his own manner of wisdom, if not skepticism, and that he was preparing both his own defense as well as empowering Euthyphro with a logical basis by which to either proceed with, or rescind in full, the charges against his father based on the logic presented by Plato thus far. (Jowett, 2008)…

Words 849 - Pages 4

Essay Solutions: Truth and Answer Selected Answer

Question 1 3.33 out of 3.33 points These A Priori beliefs which are determined to be true or false purely by examining their logical form are called: Answer Selected Answer: Tautologies Question 2 0 out of 3.33 points Thinkers from this philosophical movement are more interested in the cultural roots of a theory, than if it is “true.” Answer Selected Answer: Postmodernism Question 3 3.33 out of 3.33 points If two beliefs logically…

Words 3545 - Pages 15

Essay about ACC Chpt 1 Guide

auditing, and assurance services. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 47 Describe and define the management assertions embodied in financial statements, and why auditors use them as a focal point of the audit. 9, 10, 11 52, 54 Explain some characteristics of professional skepticism. 12 Describe the organization of public accounting firms and identify the various services they offer. 13, 14 Describe the audits and auditors in governmental, internal, and operational auditing. 15, 16, 17, 18 49, 51 List and explain the requirements…

Words 4491 - Pages 18

Explain What Are Robespierre's Ideas About The Nature Of Ideal Government

What are Robespierre's ideas about the nature of ideal government? What does he seem to believe about human nature? What does Robespierre consider to be the proper role of terror in government? Robespierre’s idea about the natural of ideal government was based upon "reason" principally. The failing was that he viewed himself as the one and only qualified to choose. Besides that, he also he pushed finishing all religion and replace with the love of unadulterated Reason. Do review cap this the gentleman…

Words 1012 - Pages 5

Ethical Absolutism, Relativism, And Pluralism

objective principles for evaluating human behavior, good or bad. The ability to interpret the morally correct resolution when confronted by a moral dilemma can be a very difficult task. In societies today, ethics are developed by one’s religious belief, government, and through experience. Social ethics serve as the premise for morality when dealing with moral conflicts such as the preservation of indigenous ways of life compared to the modernization world we now live in. According to Hinman, there…

Words 2525 - Pages 11

Identity In Frankenstein

His preconceived notions are as imaginary as their storybook beginnings, and yet they pervade the human mindset. Similarly, Shelley again highlights the predatory aspect of the Creature through William’s one-track mind that the Creature can only do him harm. Peculiarly, rather than flee or remain paralyzed with fear, William lashes out on the Creature with his acerbic diction. Called a“'monster” and “ugly wretch”, William’s epithets are the only identifications the Creature has since Frankenstein…

Words 1052 - Pages 5

Comparing Martin Luther King's And Malcolm X

3. What is exploitation, according to Young? How is it different from marginalization and from powerlessness? Why does she think that the redistribution of resources will not solve problems of exploitation? Critically assess her argument. Response: Young considers exploitation when someone’s work results are used to someone else’s benefit only adding to the other’s power, and another way of wording this would be when someone uses someone unfairly to benefit themselves. She supports her definition…

Words 1490 - Pages 6

Holden Caulfield Conformity

It is only through this democratic nature of his audience that Salinger achieves any version of that ideal community of sensibility and response whose essential absence determines Holden's resistance to the world as it is (Rowe). Also well established by this time period was the link between neurosis, self-destructive behavior, and social maladaptation on the one hand, and artistic sensibility…

Words 1067 - Pages 5

West Side Story Gender Roles

When West Side Story was released in 1957 there were several different prominent problems in society; like the Cold War, the Civil Rights movement, gang violence, and juvenile delinquency. However, there were other issues that were ignored, considered irrelevant, and disregarded as worthless like the discrimination against homosexuality and people who identified as transgender, transsexual or gender-nonconforming. The composer of West Side Story, Leonard Bernstein manage to subtlety expresses the…

Words 1883 - Pages 8