Ethical Absolutism, Relativism, And Pluralism

Ethics is the search for universal objective principles for evaluating human behavior, good or bad. The ability to interpret the morally correct resolution when confronted by a moral dilemma can be a very difficult task. In societies today, ethics are developed by one’s religious belief, government, and through experience. Social ethics serve as the premise for morality when dealing with moral conflicts such as the preservation of indigenous ways of life compared to the modernization world we now live in. According to Hinman, there are three common systems of thought regarding ethics, which are, absolutism, relativism, and pluralism. Ethical absolutists claim that there is a single standard, which is their own, when determining what assessments …show more content…
It is also known as an alternative to both moral relativism and moral absolutism. It claims that the incompatible values may not be ordered in terms of their importance and it is the idea that there are many theories about what is “right” and “wrong” (moral norms) which may be incompatible with your own personal moral norms. That there is not just one single good for human beings, but many. An example would be working within other societies where one is likely to be faced with different norms and deciding when it is appropriate to act under one norm or another would require careful consideration.
Relativism vs. absolutism:
Relativism is the denial of any absolute or objective values (truth, moral goodness, beauty, etc.) and the affirmation of the individual, community or culture as the source of values. The general relativist denies that are any objectively true statements; general relativism is the view that statements are true only from a point of view (individual, community, or culture). A relativist might say that there are no absolute moral rights for women to walk the streets unaccompanied by men; they do have that right in the U.S., but not in Afghanistan, and who are we to judge what another society believes?
Absolutism is the view that values (truth, beauty, and/or moral goodness) are independent of human opinion and has a common …show more content…
First, the moral relativist’s declare that each culture is right unto itself, but it does not help with the issue of how living together among different cultures can be achieved . This view is very liberal because it does not meddle with other cultures allowing them to do what is best for their own culture but it does not clarify how different cultures should coincide with one another. Second, the moral absolutist declares that there is a single truth and that all other positions are mistaken except for the absolutist’s own view . This view is very close-minded because it does not allow for diversity among different cultures around the world. However, ethical pluralism offers a very different view of the nature and significance of moral disagreements . I strongly agree with this because no two cultures will be the same, thus resulting in cultural differences and finding a middle ground to coincide with one another is important. By accepting that there will always not be a single truth but actually many truths in some situations that can be conflicting with one another . This allows for differentiation among views and cultures, allowing for the sharing and understanding of beliefs and values among

Show More

Cultural Relativism: A Theory Of Ethical Action

Group Project Final Draft Essay

Ethical Movie Review: Blood Diamond Essay

Essay on katie s midterm for philosophy

CSR Lecture One Essay

Essay on BWVW 101 MWF Syllabus