DACA Argument Analysis

Words: 802
Pages: 4
Open Document
In “How DACA pits ‘good immigrants’ against millions of other, “Joel Sati, a PHD student in the Jurisprudence and Social Policy program at Berkeley Law and an immigrant rights activist, reports that DACA had some benefits but the policy was never a suitable solution to our country immigration status. He believes that DACA hurt the movement by categorizing immigrants as “good” and “bad.” He then goes on and states that DACA has thrown the non-Dreamer immigrants under the bus. Even Though Joel himself is a Dreamer, he believes that with all the benefits DACA has provided, it was the wrong law to pass. Joel ends his argument with the statement, “unless we move beyond DACA, we now stand to pay the price for our myopia.” I agree with Joel that if we do not progress in our immigration situation, then DACA was the wrong movement toward our immigration status. Although I agree with that statement, I disagree to a certain extent with him that we need to make a shift toward legalizing 12 million immigrants and having safety from deportation.
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), on June 15, 2012, DHS announced that certain people who came to the U.S. as children may request consideration of DACA (USCIS). There are several criteria …show more content…
legalizing 12 million immigrants tomorrow with safety from deportations. As we all know, there are such people as “bad immigrants,” those that have committed any type of felony, unlawful things, and those that have any type of negativity background history. In my eyes when I hear “bad immigrants” this is what I pops in my head. These immigrants do not deserve to live in this country where you were given a chance and failed already. “The Trump administration this past week announced plans to remove those “bad hombres” or criminal immigrants from U.S. jails much faster.” (Persaud) I believe this is the correct version of “bad immigrants” and there is no reason for them to feel overshadowed by the policy of
Show More

Related Documents: DACA Argument Analysis

Argument Analysis: The Case For Keeping DACA By Ilya Somin

supports and argues that DACA program should not end because it is beneficial to U.S. economy and it will be act of inhumanity. The group of people who are in support for the program believes that the kids should not get punished for their parent’s mistakes, who came to the U.S. illegally. Deporting them will be inhumane because it was not their choice to enter the country when they brought here as minors by their parents or guardians. The article The Case for Keeping DACA by Ilya Somin, who is a…

Words 839 - Pages 4

How To Write A Rhetorical Analysis Of Public Argument Essay

Coin When advancing public argument people can utilize a number of tools to get their point across. In the case of the recent cancelation of the DACA legislation there has been a surge in public argument. This phenomenon lends itself to rhetorical analysis of public argument. Analyzing how people advance their argument is crucial for understanding an evolving society. Is Ending DACA the Worst Decision Trump Has Made? by William Finnegan, and Why Your Economic Argument Against Immigration Is Probably…

Words 1490 - Pages 6

Immigration Policy Reform

researcher at the National Bureau of Economic Research and a Research Fellow at the Institute for the Study of Labor. She wrote an article describing how the DREAM Act would help many undocumented immigrants. Within this article she displays the arguments that the DREAM act would support our economy and the undocumented immigrants. “So far, most studies on the effects of IRCA have provided thorough analyses of the law's effect on labor market outcomes among adult immigrants who benefited from the…

Words 1931 - Pages 8