Meanwhile, youth in child labor have deficient pay, so we should not use the products created by child labor to protect the children. Source 1 states, “Mr. Knight’s pledges did not include increased wages, a major complaint of critics who say that Nike and other American companies pay workers in China and Vietnam less than $2 a day and workers in Indonesia less than $1 a day.” This evidence shows how little money the children make, sometimes less than one dollar a day. Also, Source 2 states, “For Sialkot’s 45,000 stitchers, who earn less than $100 a month on average, soccer balls are a way of life.” This supplies another example of how little money children get paid. Moreover, Source 1 also states, “Still, even with much lower prices in these countries, critics say workers need to make at least $3 a day to achieve adequate living standards.” This evidence provides an example of how much the children should at least make to afford the bare minimum. In conclusion, child labor products should not be used since they support paying children very low wages for tough …show more content…
Source 2 states, “For Sialkot’s 45,000 stitchers, who earn less than $100 a month on average, soccer balls are a way of life.” This evidence shows how many children work in poor conditions. In addition, source 2 also states, “According to UNICEF estimates, more than 3 million boys and girls below age 14 work in Pakistan”. This adds to the first piece of evidence by showing how many children under 14 work in Pakistan. Furthermore, Source 3 states, “Every morning, Dogar’s 12 monitors perform unannounced checks on stitching centers randomly selected by computer. Still, children are found from time to time.” This evidence shows how even randomly, children are still working in harsh conditions. Thus, because of the number of child labor impacts, we should not use its