Declaration Of Rights Of Man Analysis

Words: 772
Pages: 4

The United States Bill of Rights and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man are two imperative documents in the formation of powerful countries and their governments. These documents are focused on creating a guideline of rights for the people, as well as creating a barrier as to what the government can enforce and cannot infringe upon against its people. While these documents had a similar agenda, the majority of the two are not comparable since the reason for their existence differs greatly, as well as the main goal of the document itself. Before diving into the differences of the documents, it is important to understand what they had in common first.
The US Bill of Rights was written to end a ten-year battle over the ratification of the Constitution, in which both sides got
…show more content…
This means that the common man in the United States was having his rights decided upon by a select few, therefore leaving the power to those who wrote the law. The bureaucrats settled upon the ten original articles which placed guidelines on what the government had the power to rule as well as what the people had rights to without governmental interference. Unlike the Declaration of the Rights of Man, which was written by an assembly, meaning the groups of men that were being excluded and persecuted by the government. The individuals who took place in helping right the document collectively had to agree upon what their rights should actually be, as well as who should be included within these rights. In all the Declaration of the Rights of Man had seventeen articles that encompassed all of the French people's rights, now, while it was written by the common man it had to be ratified legally. The French government did ratify these articles into law, therefore creating the same safety in regards to personal rights that the Bill of Rights