In this paper I will be discussing the assessment of the Constitution by Professor I.M, as well as whether or not the major Constitutional principles discussed in class promote or prevent “democratic” government? The Professor’s claim was that the Constitution was not designed for or by the people but as a political illusion that prevents the people from effectively using their voice in political voices1, I agree. The Constitution limits the ability of the people to effectively participate, effectively meaning adequate to accomplish a purpose; producing the intended or expected result2, in government through federalism, the system of checks and balances, and indirect election of some elected officials.
The first …show more content…
When the Constitution was being created it was just a way to get rid of the Articles of Confederation so automatically we aren’t giving the power to the people we are trying to solve the problem of what happened with the Articles of Confederation, which is a weak central government. By giving power to the federal government we created a system of checks and balances, giving us the judicial and executive branches we needed. But in creating that we limited the power of the people. Checks and Balances is a separation of powers between the three branches of government Legislative, Executive, Judicial, in reality it is an indirect way of the people to participate. Through processes of appointed officials and different responsibilities power is separated and dispersed so thin that the will people get lost. An example of this is amending the Constitution. To amend the Constitution you can’t just get every person in your, town, city, county, state, country, etc to sign petitions from saying we want this removed or this added the process is a lot harder than that. As spelled out in Article V of our Constitution to amend the constitution The Congress, “whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first