Democracy Vs Republic

Words: 486
Pages: 2

The United State ideology is founded on the philosophy of natural rights, social contract, popular sovereignty, limited government, and republicanism. James Madison, in the Federalist Papers, No. 10 wrote: “the two great points of difference between a democracy and a republic are: first, the delegation of the government in the latter, to a small number of citizens elected by the rest,” a representative democracy. “Secondly, the greater numbers of citizens, and greater sphere of country, over which the latter may be extended,” a representative government. The Founding Fathers of the United States did not want a government based on majority faction this type of faction could become too powerful and could use the power to band some of the natural rights. Historian considers that Thomas …show more content…
Creating a limited government based on the rule of laws, check and balances, the Bill of Rights, separate branches: the executive, legislative, and judicial powers of a government; the Constitution. Furthermore, The Founding Fathers opposed to the idea of having the United States as a Democracy. Opting for the idea of a Republic or Republicanism, which is to any form of government that is not a monarchy, where you have a democracy, popular sovereignty but with a limited government that protected the minority, a Democratic Republic. James Madison claimed that a republic might become vaster as it got grander and opposed faction by its selfsame assembly. Additionally, in a Democratic Republic, the popular sovereignty occurs, the people are considered sovereign, but, the people rule through representatives and not directly. John Adams discussed that the American values to be “bound by fixed laws, which the people have a voice in the making, and a right to defend.” A government of the people, by the people, and for the people or as Benjamin Franklin stated, “a republic if you can keep