Deontology

Words: 780

Pages: 4

Open Document

The problem of global hunger is serious nowadays. On the Earth, there are at least 1 billion people who are living with hunger, polluted drinking water, and malnutrition. Therefore, White (2012) suggested that we can send our contribution to organizations like Oxfam, Netaid or Hungerside on the Internet. The problem of global hunger will be solved if every Internet users contribute a dollar a week. Being one of the Internet users, I will definitely contribute with no doubt. In this essay, I am going to state my arguments and evidence by applying the theory of Deontology introduced by Immanuel Kant.

Deontology means the motive (good will) and the nature of an act are not teleological, which are not goal oriented. The rightness or wrongness of an act not explained in terms of its …show more content…
According to The Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 25 (1948), it stated that everyone has the right of living with a healthy and well-being family and oneself, including food, necessary social services, clothing, housing and medical care. Oxfam Hong Kong (2012) stated that, the Irish government revised the deprivation indicators focusing on items reflecting social inclusion and participation in society in 2007. People will be considered as material deprivation if they are lacking two or more items from the 11-item list, which included eating meals with fish, meat, chicken (or vegetarian equivalent) every second day, hanging out for a drink or meal with friends or family once a month, having a roast joint or barbecue once a week, to name but a few. To treat humanity, all people should have the basic rights to life, which is adequate food and clean drinking water. Therefore, we should contribute to the charity in order to give the needy some food through the aid provided by the

Theories Of Deontology

Deontology is a normative ethical position that judges the morality of an action based on rules. These ethics are characterized as ethics of principle rather then ethics focused on intrinsic value. They allow the judgement that actions are obligatory in addition to the value of their consequences. The deontology theories claim that certain kinds of action are obligatory, permissible, impermissible, etc. Consequentialism is the morality of an action is to be judged solely by its consequences. It examines…

Words 608 - Pages 3

Ethics Of Care Vs Deontology

biased because they do not want anything to happen to their loved ones. This ethical value counteracts the ethics of deontology. Deontology however is the opposite of the Ethics of Care. Let’s look on how Kant explains his form of deontology. Deontology is known as “ruled-based ethics.” Kant has three forms of Deontology. There is Reason, No consequence, and Universal. Deontology first form is the reason were as the people need a duty to decide what to do and not rely on emotion. When people make…

Words 1204 - Pages 5

Consequentialism Vs Deontology

Simply looking at the background of Deontology it derives from the Greek language for duty and reason. Deontology is a moral theory that guides what we ought to do and assesses the intent of each action. Deontologists obviously focus on the action, so naturally they would be in opposition with consequentialists. With that said Deontological arguments work best in relation and contrasting with consequentialist theory, also Deontology is the most logical moral decision making paradigm to follow.…

Words 216 - Pages 1

Utilitarianism Vs Deontology

ethical theories, Utilitarianism and Denotology which both can be used to evaluate whether using study drugs without a diagnosis is ethical or not. Deontology is normally defined as the consequences of one’s actions and believes that when faced with life choices, one’s should operate according to responsibility and obligations [2]. In addition, the deontology also states that even though the outcome is good, some actions are still morally wrong, but people should do them anyway because of their sense…

Words 836 - Pages 4

Deontology Vs Utilitarianism

which one perceives the action. Two schools of thought in philosophy that deal with this issue are Utilitarianism and Deontology. The judgement of what constitutes a moral action is stated in different respects. Utilitarianism is based on the principle that “an action is right if it maximizes pleasure and minimizes pain for the greatest number of people.” The polar opposite, deontology, is principled on the “accordance from duty.” In regards to the idea of treating people as a means to an end, Utilitarianism…

Words 1489 - Pages 6

Consequentialist Vs Deontology

A widely controversial issue, abortion is defined by a deliberate termination of human pregnancy. Philosophers and people alike have taken various attitudes regarding the morality of abortion, defending or attacking the permissibility of such termination. From such debate, two distinct views emerge: the consequential and the deontological perspective. The consequentialist would argue for the morality of an action to be judged on the consequences in attempt to have the best outcome with the least…

Words 1115 - Pages 5

Utilitarianism And Rule-Deontology: Case Study

I will be responding to Case A where I will apply the theories of act-utilitarianism and rule-deontology. Rule-deontology states dental therapists are subscribed to definite rules and legislation which should be adhered to in order to be “good” and moral practitioners (Kimbrough-Walls & Lautar, 2012). These rules are independent of their predicted consequence instead, their “rightness and wrongness” is dependent on its conformity to rules (Ozolins & Grainger, 2015). In accordance to rules established…

Words 722 - Pages 3

Essay on 7 Philosophies

and Contrast Research Paper | | Terence A. Betts | 3/27/2011 | Instructor: Kimber Cramer Davenport University | The textbook breaks down seven philosophies used in business decisions; they are Teleology, Egoism, Utilitarianism, Deontology, Relativist, Virtue ethics, and Justice. In this paper I will define each of the seven listed and compare and contrast so that it is clear to decipher each one from the other. Also I will provide an example of each philosophy to help provide further…

Words 1452 - Pages 6

Psychology: Philosopher Immanuel Kant Essays

Philosophy 100 Avatar: Through the yes of Kant and Deontology There is a belief that morality considers the motives for behaving in such ways that we respect a person’s free will and never treat them as a means to our own ends. Noted philosopher Immanuel Kant stated Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) page 4 “ Its true {purpose} must be to produce a will, not merely good as a means to something else, but good in itself, for which reason was absolutely necessary.” This philosophy…

Words 687 - Pages 3

Similarities and Differences in Virtue Theory, Utilitarianism, and Deontological Ethics Eth/316 Essays

172). There are many practitioners of deontology and if one was to choose one to follow it would probably be Kant (Boylan, 2009, p. 173). “Kant understood the ethical enterprise was for an individual to contemplate about acting in the world and what reason requires us to do in order to obtain/create…

Words 939 - Pages 4