Did George Kill Lennie

Words: 576
Pages: 3

Are there situations where killing a loved one is seen as not guilty? What situations would this be okay in? George asks himself these questions, and many similar to these two questions. Although some readers may see that it was acceptable for George to kill Lennie, but I disagree. Lennie may have been confused and upset at times, but he wasn’t suffering, and he definitely didn’t want to die. Georges murder is not justified because what Lennie had been doing before were accidents, because he was misunderstood. Sure, George would’ve felt bad if he had not had been the one to kill Lennie, but did George commit this crime for Lennie or himself?...

Lennie should have been treated better, and George should have taken the time to listen. George did in fact kill Curleys wife, but this was an accident. It is not George’s place to punish Lennie, he would have gotten what he deserved in the end. What George did was show his betrayal, he did not care for Lennie, but he made a promise to watch over him. George had told Lennies Aunt Clara that when she passed he would take care of him, “Him and me was both born in Auburn. I knowed his Aunt Clara. She took him when he was a baby and raised him up. When his Aunt Clara died, Lennie just come along with me out workin’. Got kinda
…show more content…
They both had been planning on investing their money on a farm with rabbits, chickens, etc. Lennie knew he had messed up a lot and felt he was a bad person, but he knew- at least thought- George would never leave him or get rid of him. “He won’t do nothing like that. I know George. Me an’ him travels together.” (Steinbeck 102) However he had been betrayed. George committed a murder, and uses Lennie being mentally challenged and troublesome as an excuse to get rid of him. George is guilty, you can’t punish someone for “murder” by murdering them yourself, that is