Does Animal Testing Make Sense

Words: 908
Pages: 4
Open Document
Animal testing does not make sense because it is cruel and inhumane to animals being tested. Scientist do many inhumane things to animals that most people try not to think about. It is necessary to consider these things if you want to determine if you are for animal testing or if you are against animal testing. ProCon.org stated, “According to Humane Society International, animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies, and killing by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck-breaking, decapitation, or other means" …show more content…
In the article, “Medical Testing on Animals is Cruel and Unnecessary”, agencies use the funds they obtain from the government to fund experimentation on animals and they stated, “Approximately forty-seven percent of the U.S. National Institutes of Health’s research involves experimentation on nonhuman animals” (Medical Testing). Our government is wasting money on animal testing because the results that scientists obtain are not very great and most animal tests tend to fail. The author of the article, “can animal data translate to innovations” stated, “Failure to adequately correct for bias by utilizing the best available research methods is evidenced by misleading results, which have needlessly involved thousands of participants in clinical trials and wasted funding and resources” (Green). This statement is trying to say that most of the clinical trials the government has wasted their money on has failed in the death of animals or failed in obtaining a cure. Also in the article, “animal testing is not essential for medical research”, they stated, “Researchers are using monkeys to supposedly conduct research on AIDS. They have spent twenty years and nearly seven million taxpayer dollars to take baby monkeys away from their mothers” (Greek). Some would argue animals are the closest thing to a human we have on earth to test on to prevent testing on humans. Although it may be true that animals are the closest thing to a human on earth, this still does not help because animals are very different from humans in many ways. In the article, Drug Safety: An Argument to Ban Animal Testing, the author states, “Animal bodies and their systems react differently from humans. In fact, animal tests and human results are the same only five percent to twenty percent of the time” (Stachura). That percentage is not enough to convince that animal testing helps humans. In conclusion, although some people
Show More

Related Documents: Does Animal Testing Make Sense

Working Together to Create One Essay

Thesis: Without a doubt, the results of a medical testing have no positive outcome. When discussing animal testing, everyone has many different opinions. In my opinion, it should be okay to test on animals. Animals have been tested on for many years and should continue to be tested on. Throughout the years that animals have been tested on, it has helped the medical part of science grow. It is a much easier process when testing on animals rather than humans. When dealing with humans being tested…

Words 594 - Pages 3

About Cosmetics Animal Testing Research

– they go mentally insane. The mind of man and animal are one in extreme and instinctive situations. However, the not-so-imaginary monkeys in question develop disturbing behaviors during their isolation: they pace, rock back and forth with anxiety, and find ways to cope with the seclusion and fear of what comes next: tests. Tests of mental strength and endurance and how to cope with the cards life has dealt them. Touch, being one of the main senses mostly all creatures contain, signals nerves that…

Words 1337 - Pages 6

Animal Testing Essay

would you feel if your pet was kept in a small cage without interaction with other animals? What if researchers shaved your pets fur off and then doused them with harsh chemicals to see if their skin will blister and burn? Or if you had a rabbit and chemicals were poured into his eyes to test the irritancy of the chemical? (Rhetorical Question). The chemicals burn like fire. (Simile). Remember that your rabbit does not have tear ducts and cannot wash the chemicals out. Now, imagine the feelings of…

Words 1599 - Pages 7

Rhetorical Analysis Essay

“Should Animals Continue to Be Used in Research Experiments?” an article by Cynthia Barnett. It seems logical that animals would be used for testing rather than humans. The question is, why? Is it really necessary for animal’s to be used as “guinea pigs?” Burnett provides evidence of how far back in time experimental research has been tested on animals. She argues that the useful information obtained from these test could have been found through alternative testing. In the article she notes strong…

Words 716 - Pages 3

Animal Issues Essay

April 2015 Why Animal Rights? Some have fur, some have feathers, some have scales, some walk on four legs, some on two, some even swim, each has their own form of communication; all these differences and yet there are simple constants between every species. Each has a heartbeat, a sense of self, a survival gene, and a will to live. There are thousands of different animal species on this planet; some of them could not be more different from one another. However all animals, both non-human and…

Words 2683 - Pages 11

Research Paper 2014

5 August 2014 Animal Testing: How long is enough? Time and time again the helpless mice are tortured, and forced to inhale toxic fumes. They’re thrown into barren cages with probably over twenty other mice; cramped, they begin to attack each other or take their own lives due to the high level of stress. Animal testing has been going on for centuries, but how long is enough? These animals are treated like nothing more than just disposable laboratory equipment and each year, over 100 million animals die in US…

Words 1210 - Pages 5

Forensic Toxicology Essay

Forensic Toxicology By: Ashley Munoz Mr. Wygand Period 5 December 5th, 2014 1. What does this field of forensics examine? Toxicology examines the effects of chemicals on the body of living beings. Usually, this field focuses on the negative effects instead of the positive. It also studies effects of chemical, biological and physical agents in biological systems that establishes the extent of damage in living beings. Forensic toxicology is used to assist in medical investigations of intoxication…

Words 1089 - Pages 5

Analysis Of What's In Your Big Mac Lab

starch. To test for lipids, Sudan IV was used. Biuret reagent was used to test for proteins. The special sauce, lettuce, cheese, and the pickle tested positive for sugar. This makes sense for the lettuce and the pickle, since they are plants, and sugar is essentially glucose which is important in plants. This also makes sense for the special sauce, because it has vegetables in it while also probably having sugars added to it. The cheese, while not a plant, also has natural sugars in it since it is…

Words 506 - Pages 3

The Journey Of A Research Dog

approval are required to be tested on animals. According to PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) millions of animals die each year in labs. They are cruelly treated, and many of them killed or die in the process of the tests. Our technology has advanced dramatically over the last 150 years, and we have the ability to test products without animal testing. Biomedical research using animals as test experiments should be stopped. For some of the animals that survive the lab tests death…

Words 2771 - Pages 12

Roman Animal Testing

anti-cruelty treatments that animals were being received, this created an emergence of the fight for animal authorities. Some people began realizing the brutal and unfair behavior that had been set on non-human creatures and hoped to give them the morality that they deserved, which made the topic of…

Words 1716 - Pages 7