The experiment results from animal tests do not consistently “translate” to human results (Gori). There is a reason why humans are not as wild and as instinctive as other creatures. There is a physical, genetic difference between humans and dogs, cats, and even the race’s closest relative – monkeys (“About Cosmetics Animal Testing”). When scientists test a product on a non-human being, results are not accurate enough to be concluded as credible and safe for human use and consumption.
Theoretically, if it takes a rabbit’s skin sixty seconds to react negatively to a new substance, it could take human skin thirty seconds to react. Using animals in place of humans for testing is simply an inconsistent method of getting accurate results to judge for human safety (Gori). Humans just do not react in the same way and using a rabbit to prove a product is harmless is merely futile.
To make another point, animal testing is quite expensive. Analysis of animal versus non-animal tests show that the cost of using such tests are cheaper in every aspect (“Costs of Animal and Non-Animal Testing”). Oftentimes, tests must continue on animals for quite a period – usually from months to years just to see how certain ingredients will affect a creature over time (“Costs of Animal and Non-Animal