Dust Bowl Migration

Words: 1054
Pages: 5

Through the perspective of Dust Bowl migrants, Steinbeck’s Grapes of Wrath details a family’s tumultuous migration from Oklahoma to California. Through plot development, Steinbeck criticizes the socio-economic dynamic of the American Dream. Despite his progressive social commentary, Steinbeck leaves out African-Americans, despite the role they played along Route 66. In his critique on Grapes of Wrath, Grant Matthew Jenkins concludes that Steinbeck must have felt overwhelmed by the role of Black Americans and decided to refrain from including them in his narrative. Steinbeck also chooses to ignore Native American history in Oklahoma, signifying his purposeful exclusion of minority races in his predominantly white book. While Grapes of Wrath …show more content…
Considering that all of the factors are the same, why are minorities continuously ignored throughout the novel? Jenkins believes that “Steinbeck may have felt inadequate to speak about the experiences of Black Americans” (187). The absence of African Americans and the erasure of Native American history in John Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath underscore a larger pattern of marginalized voices in narratives of the Dust Bowl migration. Addressing these omissions is essential for a more comprehensive understanding of the era's complexities and its impact on all segments of society. Similar to the erasure of Black towns in Oklahoma, Native American history in Oklahoma was unmentioned throughout the book. The Trail of Tears forced many American Indians to move to Oklahoma, displacing them from Michigan, Louisiana, and Florida. However, during westward expansion, the government removed them from their land in Oklahoma. The history of Native Americans in the book is not discussed by John Steinbeck. Instead, Grandpa’s refusal to abandon his homeland reflects a deep sense of attachment and belonging, despite the hardships of the Dust