Essay On Judicial Review

Words: 1131

Pages: 5

Open Document

The Supreme Court has the power to review the actions that were taken by the executive branch and the legislative branch to determine whether or not under the Constitution, that those actions are legal. This rule is called the judicial review, which can nullify any action that is considered unconstitutional. The concept of judicial review dates back all the way to ancient Greece with similarities to the graphe paranomon that is believed to be established at Athens. Modern judicial review was also influenced by ancient Rome from the Justinian Code, or Corupus Iurus Civilis. Traces of this concept were also from the judicial review introduced in England. Eventually, judicial review made its way into the United States Constitution as we know today. Athens were believed to have invented the concept of judicial review. One of the earliest of these concepts came from the graphe paranomon. This form of legal action originated from Athens under the democracy occurring around 415 B.C. Graphe paranomon meant “public suit for illegality” or “suit opposed to bills challenging the law.” This means that a suit can be used against a law that was passed already, or a law …show more content…
One of these other early influences is from ancient Rome, called the Justinian Code, or Corupus Iurus Civilis. The Justinian Code was issued during 529 to 534 by the order of the Eastern Roman Emperor, Justinian I and it was a collection of the Roman Law codified under his rule. The collection was made up of three parts: the Code (Codex), The Digest or Pandects (Digesta and Pandecta), and the Institutes (Institutiones). The Code is a collection of imperial enticements, the Digest/Pandects is an encyclopaedia made up of extracts from the works of Roman jurists, and lastly, the Institutes is a book that presents the

Judicial Review Essay

Judicial Review is the power the judicial branch of the United States government holds to declare whether certain laws are constitutional or unconstitutional. Any law passed by Congress which contradicts what the Constitution says is invalid. Since, in general, the majority rules, it is possible for the legislative branch to make laws that unconstitutionally deprive minorities of rights guaranteed to them under the Constitution. The Supreme Court uses its power of judicial review to declare laws…

Words 366 - Pages 2

An Examination of the Boundaries of, and the Theoretical Justification for Judicial Review in Tanzania. Essay

JUSTIFICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW IN TANZANIA. CONTENT PAGE 1. Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1. Administrative Authority, the overview ----------------- - 2 2. Types of Administrative Authority --------------------------- 2 2. Useful of the study…

Words 3648 - Pages 15

Importance Of Administrative Law

1. Introduction Throughout this essay I am going to analyse a select amount of headings regarding accountability. As the essay topic is so vast, this essay will be unable to account for every aspect of the title however, it contends to look in-depth at each heading instead of merely glancing at the numerous the potential talking points of this topic. The first heading regards the actual purpose of administration law, this essay shall review how administrative law works, it will do this by evaluating…

Words 986 - Pages 4

The Pros And Cons Of Constitutional Interpretation

can arise. This essay will first discuss a variety of methods for Constitutional interpretation, such as Originalism, Constitutional Fidelity, as well as Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism. Secondly, this essay will analyze the role and…

Words 966 - Pages 4

Marbury Court Perfectionism

case, the Marbury Court was primarily fundamentalist. At the moment I do not feel very happy or confident about my essay. I feel that because my thesis is not as strong as I would like it to be, the rest of my essay has also followed suit. I am still having trouble figuring my third story thesis and I think that a big part of the problem. If I had a few more days to work on my essay I would definitely try to solidify my thesis first. Additionally, I would go back and make my analysis more nuanced…

Words 1711 - Pages 7

Supreme Court Roles

courts in the country. The Supreme Court's job is to understand the Constitution and make sure laws align with it. Through the power of judicial review is how the Supreme Court evaluates what the constitution says about laws and government action. They also protect U.S. citizens' rights by ensuring that other branches of government do not intrude. In this essay, we will dive into why the Supreme Court is important, examine the Supreme Court roles and analyze a selected Supreme Court case. The Supreme…

Words 630 - Pages 3

Essay Structure

Research Essay 2,000 words: Satisfactory 1 The High Court of Australia has ultimate responsibility for interpreting the Constitution in an independent manner. Given this responsibility, how adequate are the current processes and principles of appointment of High Court judges? It’s good to give your paper a title, one that indicates your position Introduction The Governor-General is given the power to appoint judges to the Australian High Court and other courts by the Australian Constitution.1…

Words 4128 - Pages 17

How Did Marshall's Jurisprudence Play In Strengthening The Power Of Federal Government

David Remedies Poli 411 essay. Marshall's jurisprudence played a significant role in strengthening the power of the federal government. He believed in a broad interpretation of the Constitution, which allowed the federal government to exercise more authority. Marshall's decisions, such as in the case of McCulloch v. Maryland, expanded the federal government's powers by affirming its ability to create a national bank and asserting the supremacy of federal law over state law. His rulings helped establish…

Words 825 - Pages 4

Tax Law Essay

Introduction 2 2 Consequence of possible remedies 2 3 Is Inspector General of Taxation or the Tax Ombudsman helpful? 4 4 Does Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1997 or s 75 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act or s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 provide routes? 4 5 Conclusion 6 6 References 7 Introduction The essay is about the case of an individual taxpayer. ATO has decided audit her even if she has a record of adequate tax returns as well as a reputable tax agent…

Words 2034 - Pages 9

Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti Federalists

constitution. The Federalists were for the ratification of the constitution. They favored a strong central government. Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison defended the constitution in a series of essays published known as the Federalist papers. They explained the separation of powers and judicial review. The anti federalists feared the ratification of the constitution. They feared it would lead to aristocratic tyranny and felt their personal liberties were not protected. They wanted a list of guaranteed…

Words 112 - Pages 1