Ethical Utilitarianism Theory

Words: 627
Pages: 3

The Ethical Utilitarianism theory is one of the trends in the teleological theory (effect) founded by two Britsh philosophers, Jeremy Benthan (1784-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873). As a proponent of the action it is considered correct (ethical) if it can bring the desired (desired) consequences of charity. The intended virtue must be the best and for as many people as possible. In short, everyone involved in the consequences of the action must be given equal consideration. Hence it is arguable that the determination of proper action is the process of maximizing charity.

Utilitarianism - acting also emphasizes individual actions rather than general rules. Expressions like "Exactly promise", "Do not cheat" and "Do not bribe" are just general guidelines. Anytime, this barrier can be violated if it is a good result.

The second stream in utilitarianism is utilitarianism-a rule supported by Richard Brandt. According to him If one acts according to the rules it is sure to produce the best virtues for many people. Obviously the individual action is considered correct in parallel with the existing rules.
…show more content…
So from a utilitarian point of view, the results of corrupt behavior are determinative of whether or not corruption can be ethically permissible. For example, the act of corruption can create great pleasure for a single family. However, if many more families suffer without the money that was stolen, then corruption can be said to generate more pain than pleasure. On the other hand, if an individual corruption that would otherwise go towards a government project that is already overfunded or if an individual steals a negligible amount of money from multiple sources, there might not be a lot of pain that results from the act. In fact, it is possible that no one would even