Ethics: Ethics and Happiness Essay

Submitted By samanthasacco
Words: 1254
Pages: 6
Open Document
Ethics add value to a person and in turn, to society. Ethics require a personal code, a set of beliefs and values that help us to make meaningful choices. The key word in this last statement is, “choice.” Perhaps the most beautiful aspect of humanity is the diversity of thought and lifestyle. I believe that ethics and diversity go hand in hand, as each individual has developed their codes based on their personal experiences and backgrounds. It is this fact that I do not believe in one set of ethics for all people, but rather a mix of ethics. I found each set of ethics interesting and could relate, on some level, to all of them. Behind each set of ethics, there is an underlying motive driving the choices that we make.
Ancient philosophers believed that ethics were a means to perfecting human existence. The code that existed for the theorists of the ancients reflects the time that they lived. There is a comforting simplicity that was drawn in ancient ethics and in ideal world these ethics make sense, to me. For instance, Socrates compares human values to the tools of a carpenter, a carpenter must not only possess such tools, but he must know how to use his tools, in order to be successful (Euthyd. 280b-d) I love the idea of values being tools. Tools exist to build, our values also help us to build the existences we wish for ourselves and those around us. This fundamental idea is simple but profound and powerful when analyzing values.
Aristotle had some interesting views on what makes a person virtuous. Although criticized for being self-serving, I tend to agree with Aristotle’s outlook. He says, that the ultimate and complete end in a human’s life is happiness and all other activity is a means to achieve happiness. Happiness is not chosen for the sake of anything else (1097a 25-1097b5). Aristotle’s view on happiness is certainly true, happiness is an isolated emotion that most people spend their lives trying to achieve. My issue with this statement is, if we spend our lives trying to achieve an end which is happiness, we are unable to enjoy the many happy moments that exist along the way.
Aristippus delves deeper into the idea of happiness not being an end goal, but rather immediate particular pleasures (DL II 90). There is truth in both philosophers’ outlooks on happiness. It makes sense, to me, that a life full of small particular pleasures, is a happy life well lived. A happy life, well lived, will certainly lead to a happy fulfilled end. Aristippus also teaches that bodily pleasures are much better than mental pleasures. This statement is difficult for me to buy into. I believe that pleasures are in the eye of the beholder and a feeling cannot be a fact for all.
I like the ideas of Plato and Aristotle because, for the most part, they leave room for interpretation and modification. The issue with other ancient theories, is the same problem that is present in modern ethical ideas. Ethics are a code which is necessary for a functional society, but a singular identical code is not. It is the extremists like Diogenese that smother individuality and place judgment on others who do not live the way they live. Diogenes goes as far as to say, love is for the idle and love of money is for the condemned (DL VI 50-51). What Diogenese, and others like him, fail to see, is that love and love for money do not cause evils in the world, it is the people who use these powerful emotions to fuel bad behavior. Removing temptations will not remove the problems, as the problems exist in the core and temptations will always be present in one form or another. I have no issue with living without temptation or luxury but I do feel it is a personal choices and whatever is decided should not be judged, if no harm is being done.
Ethical theories are a lot like most big ideas, they evolve as society changes. Ancient philosophers valued knowledge and courage, two necessities for being virtuous and progressive during that time. Ancient ethics existed in
Show More

Related Documents: Ethics: Ethics and Happiness Essay

The Role Of Happiness In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

Aristotle views happiness as the end of good, because we choose happiness as an end itself. Many virtues are viewed as good since they bring happiness to us such as goodness or morality. Both of these virtues are seen as good since they fulfil their function of bringing happiness to someone’s life. But by these standards, anything that brings an individual happiness is seen as good so would murder be considered good if it brought someone happiness? Instead do we view the happiness of the whole over…

Words 464 - Pages 2

On Happiness 1 Essay

ethics On Happiness Sara, Reno, Mia ~Happiness as the Chief goal of Ethics Is and/or should Happiness be the Chief goal of Ethics? One may argue that other entities in life make up the top priorities of Ethics, such as Religion, Moral Code, as well as other virtues. Yet, is it not true that happiness is all derived from the aforementioned. Therefore, by being able to stand for something and have morals to believe in, humanity has the chance to obtain happiness. The real question lies in the difference…

Words 677 - Pages 3

Darrin Mcmahon Happiness

In the essay “What does the ideal of happiness mean”, Darrin McMahon provides an overview of what people were thinking about happiness in three time periods: Ancient Greece, the Enlightenment, and modern times. The three great philosophers of Ancient Greece - Socrates, Plato and Aristotle - all saw happiness as the most important part of life. During the enlightenment, Protestant Christians such as Luther and Calvin saw happiness as a sign of good Christianity, and sadness became a sin. Secular movements…

Words 704 - Pages 3

Utilitarian Ethical Dilemmas

Utilitarian Ethics Utilitarianism actions are judged right and wrong solely on their consequence, and in order to assess this consequence, the only thing that matters is the amount of happiness and unhappiness caused and by calculating happiness and unhappiness caused, nobody’s happiness counts any more than anybody else’s. Utilitarian ethics are the most common form of ethics used today; it has advanced because two needs have been met by it. Firstly, is the end-based thinking which is common and…

Words 959 - Pages 4

Ethics Class Essay

Mull English 1B 15 September 2014 Ethics According to the Philosophers “In speaking of a man’s character we do not say that he is wise or intelligent, but that he is gentle or temperate; yet we praise the wise man too for the disposition he has developed within himself, and praiseworthy dispositions we call virtues.” The ultimate goal to achieve the “aim of man” is finding the meaning of happiness, according to Aristotle. One of his ideas of happiness is to become a virtuous human being or…

Words 443 - Pages 2

Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: The Chief Human Good

Throughout Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle addresses the importance of happiness and what it means to seek happiness. Discussing the main principles of what forms happiness can take and how humans display their happiness, Aristotle forms his opinion around the idea of the chief human good, which is also referred to as eudaimonia. Aristotle uses this to base his instrumental reasoning that all things are done by a human for the sake of happiness. This idea of the chief good is in Chapter 7 where…

Words 840 - Pages 4

Virtue Ethics Essay

is “What should I do?" or "How should I act?" Ethics is supposed to provide us with "moral principles" or universal rules that tell us what to do. Virtue ethics is teleological because it argues that we should practice being good, or virtuous people over time. Virtue ethics is therefore not deontological (like Kant’s ethics) and it is also not normative. It is known as aretaic ethics from the Greek word arête meaning excellence or virtue. Virtue ethics is not concerned with what we ought to do, but…

Words 663 - Pages 3

Cultural Relativism Examples

Introduction There is no objective way to justify punishment; each person has their own subjective view on how it can be justified. It comes down to the two main branches of moral philosophy – meta-ethics and normative ethics. Meta-ethics focus on the foundations and methodology of morals. Some examples of meta-ethical theories include cultural relativism; this holds the idea that “right” is what is accepted by the majority of a given culture; moral subjectivism; this holds the idea that if we personally…

Words 393 - Pages 2

Virtue Ethics and Ethics of Care Essay

Fried Pataters Mr. Hahn Phil 2310 10 May 2010 Virtue Ethics and Ethics of Care Aristotle and Rita Manning both have different theories when it comes to ethics. Aristotle uses virtue ethics to answer questions about morality whereas Manning uses what is called ethics of caring to do the same thing. Virtue ethics claims people’s actions aim towards the highest good of happiness. From happiness, moral virtue stems from reasons governing the desires of the soul. Manning on the other hand believes…

Words 2363 - Pages 10

Contrating Plato and Aristotle Essay

Aristotle and Platos Theories of Ethics Uploaded by snwboarder on Oct 27, 2011 This essay examines Aristotle’s and Plato’s theories of ethics, and briefly compares them. Classical Theories of Ethics – Outline I Introduction II Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics III Plato’s Republic IV Brief Comparison V Conclusion Classical Theories of Ethics I Introduction The study of ethics takes us all the way back to classical Greece. Since it does, I thought it might be useful to compare…

Words 978 - Pages 4